The Keep Our PACT Act mandates long-term federal funding increases for Title I education programs and special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Chris Van Hollen
Senator
MD
The Keep Our PACT Act ensures federal support for public education by establishing mandatory funding increases for Title I programs and special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). By providing a decade-long roadmap for increased investment, the bill aims to fulfill long-standing federal commitments to school districts and students with disabilities. This legislation designates these funds as emergency spending to ensure consistent, reliable resources for schools across the country.
The Keep Our PACT Act is essentially a long-term financial commitment to public education, specifically targeting two areas that have been underfunded for decades: schools in low-income neighborhoods and special education services. By shifting this funding from the 'maybe' pile of discretionary spending to the 'must-pay' category of mandatory spending, the bill aims to give school districts a predictable roadmap for their budgets over the next ten years. It also uses an 'emergency' designation to bypass standard budget rules, ensuring these billions flow even if there aren't immediate spending cuts elsewhere to balance the books.
For years, the federal government has promised to cover 40% of the extra cost of educating students with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), but in reality, it has often fallen short. Section 4 of this bill creates a steep staircase to finally reach that 40% mark. Starting in 2026, the bill mandates an appropriation of at least $6.4 billion (or 4.5% of the national cost), steadily climbing every year until 2035, when it hits a permanent floor of either $69.6 billion or 40% of the total national cost—whichever is higher. For a parent of a child with an Individualized Education Program (IEP), this could mean the difference between a school having the budget for a dedicated speech therapist or a full-time aide versus having to wait months for basic evaluations.
Title I funding is the primary tool the government uses to level the playing field for schools serving students from low-income families. Section 3 of the bill sets specific, mandatory dollar amounts for these programs, starting at roughly $20.5 billion in 2026 and scaling up to over $54.3 billion by 2035. This isn't just a suggestion; it’s a direct appropriation from the Treasury. In practical terms, this means a principal at a Title I school could potentially plan multi-year literacy programs or hire permanent math coaches knowing the federal check won't shrink just because the political winds in D.C. changed during the annual budget cycle.
Perhaps the most savvy—and controversial—part of the bill is Section 5, which labels all this new spending as an 'emergency.' Usually, the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act requires that if Congress spends a dollar on a new program, they have to find a dollar to cut somewhere else or raise a dollar in taxes. By using the emergency label, this bill sidesteps those 'pay-go' rules and procedural hurdles. While this ensures the education funding remains untouched by other budget fights, it also means the national debt would absorb the full cost of these increases without immediate offsets. For the average taxpayer, it’s a trade-off: guaranteed investment in local classrooms today versus a larger bill for the federal deficit down the road.