PolicyBrief
S. 3410
119th CongressDec 10th 2025
A bill to establish Federal agency technology and artificial intelligence talent teams to improve competitive service hiring practices, and for other purposes.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes federal technology and AI talent teams to modernize and improve competitive service hiring practices for critical tech roles.

Andy Kim
D

Andy Kim

Senator

NJ

LEGISLATION

Federal Tech Hiring Overhaul: Agencies Get 'AI Talent Teams' to Speed Up Recruitment and Ditch Generic Exams

This bill is essentially a massive upgrade to how the federal government plans to hire its tech talent—specifically in artificial intelligence (AI) and related fields. It allows federal agencies to set up specialized “Technology and AI Talent Teams.” The core idea is to stop relying on slow, generic hiring processes that lose top candidates to the private sector. Instead, these teams will focus on developing job-specific exams, writing clear job announcements, and sharing lists of pre-vetted, qualified candidates across the government. It’s an effort to make federal service competitive for the people who actually know how to build and manage modern technology, right down to the specific provision that allows agencies to use subject matter experts (SMEs)—the actual engineers and data scientists—to help develop and administer technical assessments for applicants.

The Government’s New Recruiting Strategy: Pooled Talent and Specialized Tests

Think of this like the government finally ditching the old, clunky job board in favor of a modern recruiting firm, but internal. The bill tasks the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with establishing a central Federal Technology and AI Talent Team. This OPM team will run government-wide pooled hiring efforts, essentially creating a shared pipeline of tech talent that multiple agencies can draw from. For the average applicant, this means applying once and potentially being considered by several agencies at the same time, significantly streamlining the process. Crucially, the bill also mandates OPM create an online platform for agencies to share and customize technical assessments. This means if the Department of Energy develops a great coding challenge for AI specialists, the Department of Veterans Affairs can use and adapt it, avoiding wasted time and ensuring the tests are actually relevant to the job.

Why This Matters for the Tech Worker

If you’re a software engineer, data scientist, or cybersecurity expert, this bill changes how you get hired by the government. Currently, federal hiring often relies on broad, sometimes irrelevant, assessments and self-rated questionnaires. This bill shifts the focus entirely to technical assessments developed by people who actually understand the job—the Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). For example, instead of answering vague questions about your “leadership skills,” you might take a work-related exercise or a skills-based coding test. This is a huge win for those with demonstrable skills, as it allows them to skip the bureaucratic hoops and prove their competence directly. The bill defines these Technical Assessments to include structured interviews, work-related exercises, and even external industry assessments, making the federal hiring experience feel much more like applying for a job in the private sector.

The Fine Print: Moving Beyond the Automated Checkbox

There’s a quiet but significant provision buried in the definitions section that targets one of the most frustrating aspects of current federal hiring: the automated self-assessment. The bill states that five years after its enactment, an “examination cannot solely or principally rely upon a self-assessment from an automated examination.” This means the days of simply clicking “Expert” on 50 skills and getting a high score will eventually be over. The intent is clearly to force agencies to use real, objective assessments. However, there is a catch: an agency’s Chief Human Capital Officer can waive this restriction with a written justification to OPM. While OPM has to post the waiver publicly, this loophole could potentially allow agencies to continue using the easier, less effective self-assessment method if they can justify it. This is an area to watch, as it could undermine the bill's intent to modernize hiring if waivers become too common.