PolicyBrief
S. 3401
119th CongressDec 9th 2025
Pathways to Prosperity Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes the Strengthening Community Colleges Workforce Development Grants program to fund community colleges in creating or expanding high-quality workforce programs that lead to recognized credentials in high-skill industries.

Roger Marshall
R

Roger Marshall

Senator

KS

LEGISLATION

New 'Pathways to Prosperity Act' Funds Community College Training for High-Skill, High-Wage Jobs

The new Pathways to Prosperity Act establishes a competitive grant program aimed squarely at leveling up workforce training at community colleges. Essentially, the bill creates a new funding stream under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) for colleges to build, improve, or expand programs that lead to recognized, stackable credentials in high-skill, high-wage, or in-demand sectors. The goal is to better align what colleges teach with what employers actually need.

The New Skill Pipeline: Employer Partnerships Required

This isn't just about handing out money; it’s about strategic investment. To even apply for these grants, colleges must demonstrate a strong, existing partnership with local employers in a targeted high-skill industry. If you’re a mid-career worker looking to pivot, or a recent grad trying to break into a specialized field like advanced manufacturing or cybersecurity, this bill is designed to create more direct, high-quality training options for you.

Crucially, the grant funds are mandated to be used for specific activities, including creating evidence-based career pathway programs and providing comprehensive career services—think coaching, mentorship, and case management for participants. The bill explicitly requires these programs to incorporate work-based learning opportunities, which means less time in a classroom simulation and more time getting hands-on experience that employers value. For a community college, this means they’ll be using grant money to build the curriculum and systems needed to make apprenticeships and on-the-job training a reality.

Who Gets Priority and What’s the Catch?

The Secretary of Labor is directed to give priority to institutions that serve individuals with barriers to employment (like those with limited education or criminal records) or incumbent workers who need foundational skills to advance. This is a big deal for equity: it ensures the new funding focuses on helping those who need the career lift the most. Another priority is given to colleges that use competency-based assessments to award academic credit for prior learning. If you’ve been working in a trade for ten years but never got the degree, this provision could help you fast-track a credential by testing out of basic courses based on your experience.

However, the grant structure itself has a few interesting rules. A college can receive a multi-year grant (up to two years), but then they have to wait two years before applying for another one. This waiting period is designed to prevent colleges from becoming dependent on these specific federal dollars, forcing them to focus on program sustainability—meaning they have to figure out how to keep the successful programs running after the grant money is gone. If they don't meet their performance targets during the first grant, that two-year wait could become a hard stop.

Accountability is Built-In

One of the strongest features of the Pathways to Prosperity Act is its focus on transparency and measurable results. The Secretary must establish specific performance targets for every grantee, which go beyond simple enrollment numbers. They include standard WIOA metrics (like employment rates and earnings) but also capacity building (how much employer engagement increased) and participant outcomes (like program completion rates and advancement for incumbent workers).

If you’re a student, this means the college is directly incentivized to get you hired and keep your earnings up. If you’re a taxpayer, the bill mandates that the Secretary publish annual data online detailing each grantee’s performance and the number of individuals served. This public reporting means the grant program’s effectiveness isn't hidden behind bureaucratic reports—it’s out in the open for everyone to see. Furthermore, no more than 7% of the funds can be used for administrative costs, keeping the focus on direct program delivery.