PolicyBrief
S. 3383
119th CongressDec 17th 2025
Unlocking Native Lands and Opportunities for Commerce and Key Economic Developments Act of 2025
AWAITING SENATE

This bill modifies existing laws to expand leasing authority on certain Indian lands and grants tribes the authority to approve rights-of-way across their own tribal land, provided they meet specific environmental review and regulatory standards.

Brian Schatz
D

Brian Schatz

Senator

HI

LEGISLATION

Tribal Lands Bill Cuts Federal Red Tape for Rights-of-Way, Shifts Environmental Review to Tribes

The “Unlocking Native Lands and Opportunities for Commerce and Key Economic Developments Act of 2025” is all about streamlining economic development on Tribal trust lands. Essentially, this bill updates two older laws to give Indian Tribes much more control over who gets to lease land or run infrastructure—like a pipeline or a power line—across their territory. The big change is that Tribes can now grant these rights-of-way without needing the Secretary of the Interior’s sign-off on every single project, provided they have an approved regulatory system in place.

The New Rules of the Road

For a Tribe to take over the approval process, they first have to write up their own regulation and get the Secretary’s okay. This tribal regulation must include an environmental review process. Think of it as creating their own local version of the federal review process. It has to identify environmental impacts, include a public comment period, and require the Tribe to respond to those comments before the right-of-way is approved. The bill is clear: the Secretary has 180 days to review and approve or disapprove the Tribe’s regulation. If they don't act, the clock runs out, and that regulation is effectively approved, putting pressure on the Department of the Interior to move fast.

Sovereignty vs. Oversight: The Trade-Off

This is a major boost for Tribal sovereignty and economic speed. If a Tribe wants to build a new commercial center or allow a utility company to run a line, they can now bypass the often-slow federal bureaucracy. For a developer or a utility company, this means project timelines could shrink dramatically, potentially making infrastructure projects cheaper and faster to execute. However, there’s a massive asterisk here: the Secretary’s decision to approve the Tribe’s regulatory framework is explicitly exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This means the federal government won't be conducting its usual deep-dive environmental review on the system the Tribe creates, even though that system will govern major projects.

Who Carries the Risk?

The bill also makes a significant change regarding liability. The United States explicitly states it is not liable for losses sustained by any party involved in a right-of-way granted under this new tribal authority. If you’re a company building a solar farm on Tribal land, or a bank financing that project, the federal government is stepping back from its traditional role as a backstop. This shifts the risk profile entirely onto the Tribes and the private parties involved. While the Secretary retains the right to step in and enforce or even cancel a right-of-way if a Tribe violates its own approved regulation, the U.S. government is essentially saying, “You run the process, you own the outcome.”

Real-World Impact: Speed vs. Scrutiny

For Tribes, this is a clear win for self-determination, giving them the tools to manage their lands and attract investment on their own terms. But it also means they take on the full responsibility—and potential legal challenges—of environmental review. For environmental advocates and the general public, the exemption of the new tribal regulations from NEPA and ESA review is a concern. It means that while individual projects will have a review, the overarching regulatory mechanism that allows these projects to happen won't receive the federal environmental scrutiny we’re used to seeing. This bill is a classic trade-off: more speed and self-governance for Tribes, but potentially less federal environmental oversight on the processes governing development on Native lands.