This act amends Department of Justice investigation procedures by removing a specific exception regarding allegations handled by the Inspector General.
Richard Durbin
Senator
IL
The Inspector General Access Act of 2025 amends existing law to streamline investigations of Department of Justice personnel. Specifically, this bill removes a previous exception regarding certain types of allegations from the general investigation procedures governing the Inspector General. This change ensures that the Inspector General has broader authority to investigate all relevant matters concerning DOJ personnel.
The Inspector General Access Act of 2025 is short, but it makes a targeted change to how the Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) conducts investigations into DOJ personnel. Essentially, this bill removes a specific exemption that previously shielded certain types of allegations against DOJ staff from the IG’s general investigation rules. This is a technical move, but it matters for accountability.
Section 2 of the Act amends Section 413 of title 5, U.S. Code, which is the rulebook for IG investigations at the DOJ. The core action is striking the exception for "allegations described in subsection (b)(3)" from the general investigation procedures in subsection (d). Think of it like this: If the IG is the referee, this bill removes a specific rule that previously made certain fouls unreviewable. The bill then cleans up the resulting statutory mess by striking paragraph (3) entirely and renumbering the remaining paragraphs (4) and (5) to keep the text consistent (SEC. 2).
Because the bill doesn't specify what was in the now-removed paragraph (b)(3), we can only analyze the procedural effect. Previously, whatever was described in that section—some type of allegation or conduct—was handled differently than standard IG investigations. By removing this exception, the bill effectively subjects those previously exempted allegations to the standard investigative procedures and oversight of the Inspector General. This is a clear procedural win for government oversight, potentially broadening the IG's reach. For DOJ personnel, particularly those whose conduct fell under the protection of the old exception, this means increased scrutiny and less procedural protection from the IG’s investigative authority.
For the average person, this bill won't change their commute or their grocery bill, but it affects the integrity of the government agencies that serve them. The Inspector General is tasked with rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse within the DOJ—the agency responsible for enforcing federal law. When an IG’s hands are tied by exceptions, public trust can erode. This Act removes a procedural barrier, making it easier for the IG to apply standard investigation rules across the board. If the IG is investigating an allegation of misconduct—say, improper use of government resources or ethical violations—this bill ensures that one set of rules applies, regardless of the specific nature of the allegation that was previously carved out by subsection (b)(3). It’s a move toward simplifying and strengthening the accountability framework for one of the most powerful agencies in the government.