This bill realigns the use of the Technology Modernization Fund, adds strict repayment and reporting requirements for funded projects, and establishes new processes for identifying and reporting high-risk legacy IT systems.
Jerry Moran
Senator
KS
The Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act realigns the use of the Technology Modernization Fund to focus on modernizing legacy IT, enhancing cybersecurity, and improving agency efficiency. It establishes stricter repayment terms for agencies receiving funds and introduces new requirements for identifying and reporting high-risk federal IT systems. The bill also modifies the Technology Modernization Board's review criteria and sets a fixed sunset date for the Fund after December 31, 2032.
The Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act is shaking up how the federal government pays for its tech upgrades. This bill takes the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF)—the government’s internal venture capital fund for fixing ancient computer systems—and slaps some serious new rules on it. Essentially, it’s turning the TMF from a grant-like resource into a much stricter internal loan program, extending its lifespan until after December 31, 2032.
The biggest change is financial accountability. Previously, the funding felt more like a budgetary allocation; now, it’s a strict loan. Agencies receiving money from the TMF must now enter into agreements that require them to repay the Fund. The goal is simple: ensure the TMF always has enough money to keep lending until its new sunset date. For you, the taxpayer, this means less chance of the fund running dry and more pressure on agencies to make sure their IT projects actually save money and deliver value so they can afford the repayment.
Crucially, the bill also tightens the funding pipeline. Money will now be transferred to agencies on an incremental basis, tied directly to metric-based development milestones. Think of it like a construction loan: you don't get the next chunk of cash until the inspector confirms the foundation is poured correctly. This is a huge shift for agencies that might need a large chunk of capital upfront for a complex overhaul. If an agency struggles to hit its targets or prove its progress, the money stops flowing. The Administrator also gains the power to suspend or terminate funding if the agency provides fraudulent or misleading statements in the application, putting serious pressure on agency heads and CIOs to be transparent and accurate from day one.
This bill introduces a mandatory, government-wide dragnet for the worst offenders in federal IT: the high-risk legacy information technology systems. Within 180 days of the new rules taking effect, every agency CIO must hand over a list of their most precarious, outdated systems to the Federal CIO. The Federal CIO then compiles a notorious list of the top 10 government-wide systems that pose the greatest security, privacy, and operational risks. This list must be reported directly to Congress and the Comptroller General.
Why does this matter to you? These legacy systems are often the reason government websites crash, data breaches happen, or simple tasks take forever. By forcing agencies to identify and report their biggest tech liabilities, the bill aims to prioritize the modernization projects that will most directly improve public service delivery and reduce the chance of a major security failure. It’s an attempt to force the government to fix the creaky, insecure systems before they break completely.
For the people inside the agencies—the Chief Information Officers (CIOs) and project managers—this is a major increase in workload and oversight. They are now under immense pressure to guarantee repayment and deliver projects that meet strict, pre-defined metrics. If you’re a contractor or a federal employee working on an IT project, you’ll be seeing a lot more oversight and stricter deadlines tied to those incremental funding releases. The Technology Modernization Board, which reviews project proposals, must now specifically consider the agency’s ability to ensure repayment, adding a layer of financial scrutiny to the technical review.
While the goal is better, more secure government tech, the challenge lies in implementation. Defining those “metric-based development milestones” can be tricky in complex IT development, and if the metrics are poorly chosen, agencies could end up chasing easy wins instead of tackling truly hard modernization problems. But overall, this bill is a clear push for greater fiscal discipline and a more aggressive approach to retiring the government’s most dangerous, outdated tech.