This bill establishes a pilot program to create or enhance a technology platform connecting veterans with local support services and mandates the collection of social determinant of health data during routine screenings.
Dan Sullivan
Senator
AK
This bill establishes the LINC VA Act to create a pilot program for a community integration platform connecting veterans with local support services like housing, healthcare, and job training. The platform will coordinate services, track referrals, and collect standardized data on veterans' social needs. The program will be evaluated to assess its impact on veterans' health outcomes and access to necessary resources.
The Leveraging Integrated Networks in Communities for Veterans Act, or the LINC VA Act, sets up a pilot program at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to fix one of the biggest headaches for veterans: coordinating all the services they need. This bill mandates the creation or enhancement of a “community integration platform”—think of it as a specialized digital hub—designed to connect veterans directly with local support organizations.
This isn’t just about medical care. The platform must coordinate a huge range of services, including housing assistance, job training, child care, legal aid, and even suicide prevention programs. The goal is to stop the frustrating runaround veterans often face when trying to get help from different agencies. The VA, through its Center for Innovation for Care and Payment, has one year from enactment to get this pilot up and running in at least five different VA medical facilities, including those in remote or underserved areas.
One of the most significant requirements in this bill is a mandate for the VA to standardize how it identifies a veteran’s non-medical needs. Currently, if you ask five different clinics about a veteran’s housing situation, you might get five different answers. The LINC VA Act requires the VA to collect information on Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)—the factors outside the clinic walls that affect well-being, like housing stability or food security—during routine health screenings.
Specifically, the VA must use standardized definitions based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes Z55 through Z63 and Z75. These codes cover things like problems related to education, employment, housing, and social environment. By using these codes, the VA can start measuring the severity of these needs, which should provide a clear, trackable picture of what veterans actually need versus what they are currently getting. This data collection is mandatory for all veterans enrolled in the VA’s annual patient enrollment system.
The success of this platform hinges on its ability to talk to the outside world. The bill defines a wide range of “covered entities” that must be linked, including community-based organizations, public health exchanges, and state housing authorities. For a veteran struggling with rent, this means the platform should coordinate between their VA primary care team and the local housing agency, all while tracking the referral to ensure the veteran actually gets help.
Crucially, the bill requires coordination with State Medicaid programs. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must issue guidance to states on how to align Medicaid services with the VA pilot. This opens the door for states to use existing Medicaid waiver authority (Section 1115 waivers) to help cover some of the non-medical services coordinated through the platform, potentially bridging a major funding gap for social services.
For those of us who worry about government programs that sound great on paper but fail in practice, the bill includes strong accountability measures. The VA must track three key metrics: the accuracy of referrals (Did the vet get sent to the right place?), the response time of the referred provider (How long did they wait?), and the outcome of the initial meeting (Did they actually get the help they needed?). This tracking can be done in any medium the Secretary deems appropriate.
Furthermore, the Comptroller General (CG) is required to conduct an independent evaluation measuring the platform's overall impact on veterans’ health outcomes and access to services. The CG’s report, due four years after enactment, must be made public and include data on the most utilized resources and, critically, service requests that could not be met. This ensures the program isn't just evaluated internally, but by an external watchdog, providing a necessary layer of transparency and analysis on what’s working and what isn’t.