This bill mandates a feasibility study for new VA hospitals in Alaska, Hawaii, and New Hampshire, and locks in current Community Care Program eligibility for veterans based on the date of enactment.
Dan Sullivan
Senator
AK
The Measuring Availability of Providers (MAP) for Veterans Act mandates a feasibility study on building new, full-service VA hospitals in Alaska, Hawaii, and New Hampshire. It also requires the public release of these study results within one year. Furthermore, the bill clarifies that a veteran's eligibility for the Veterans Community Care Program, based on their state lacking a full-service VA facility, is locked to the date this Act is enacted.
The Measuring Availability of Providers (MAP) for Veterans Act is a short but impactful piece of legislation focused on two things: potentially expanding VA infrastructure and immediately tweaking who qualifies for private care under the VA system.
First, let's talk about the potential expansion. Section 2 requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a feasibility study on building a new, full-service VA hospital in three states: Alaska, Hawaii, and New Hampshire. If you live in one of these states, this is a big deal, as access to comprehensive VA care can be a major challenge. The bill doesn't guarantee a hospital will be built—it just requires the VA to study whether it can be built. The good news for transparency is that the VA must publish the results of this study on a public website within one year of the Act becoming law. This means the public will get a clear, official look at the logistics, costs, and challenges involved in potentially expanding access in these underserved areas.
The second part, Section 3, is where things get a little technical and potentially complicated for veterans moving forward. It deals with the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP). One reason a veteran might qualify for the VCCP—allowing them to see a private, community doctor paid for by the VA—is if they live in a state without a full-service VA medical facility. This bill amends Title 38, U.S. Code, to specify that a veteran’s eligibility based on this lack of a facility is determined as of the date the MAP Act is enacted.
Think of this as setting a hard date stamp. For veterans currently in Alaska, Hawaii, or New Hampshire who qualify for VCCP because their state lacks a full-service VA hospital, their eligibility status is now locked in. The freeze provides stability for those currently using the program. However, it creates a potential hurdle for future veterans. If you move to one of these states after the enactment date, you can no longer qualify for VCCP based solely on the state lacking a full-service VA facility, even if the facility status hasn't changed. This means future veterans moving into these states will have to rely on other VCCP eligibility criteria (like wait times or distance from a VA facility) to access community care, even if the VA hospital situation remains exactly the same. It’s a subtle change, but one that could significantly impact healthcare access for new residents in these states.