This bill repeals the reduced postage rate currently available to qualified political committees, eliminating subsidies for political junk mail.
Joni Ernst
Senator
IA
This act, the "Ending Subsidies for Political Junk Mail Act," eliminates the special, reduced postage rate currently available to qualified political committees. By repealing this discounted mailing rate, the bill aims to stop taxpayer subsidies for political mailings.
The aptly named Ending Subsidies for Political Junk Mail Act is short, sweet, and to the point: it eliminates the special discounted postage rate that "qualified political committees" currently receive for their mailings. Think of it as ending a bulk discount program specifically targeted at political campaigns and organizations.
Right now, political committees get a break on mailing costs, essentially using a reduced rate subsidized by the government (and ultimately, the taxpayer). This bill, found in Section 2, repeals that reduced postage rate entirely. In the real world, this means that political organizations will now have to pay the same commercial rates as everyone else—like your local small business sending out flyers or a non-profit sending annual reports. The bill also includes technical adjustments to renumber the relevant sections of Title 39 of the U.S. Code, which is just the legislative cleanup needed when you delete an existing provision.
For the average person, this bill doesn't change the price of a stamp or how often your utility bill arrives. The impact is felt primarily by two groups. First, qualified political committees and campaigns will see their operational costs for mass mailings go up. If they were planning to carpet-bomb your neighborhood with glossy flyers, that process just got more expensive. For campaigns that rely heavily on physical mail to reach older voters or those without reliable internet access, this could mean rethinking their budget or shifting funds from other areas.
Second, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and taxpayers benefit. The USPS potentially gains revenue by charging the full rate for these high-volume mailings, which helps the service's bottom line. For taxpayers, it means removing an indirect subsidy. You were essentially helping to pay for that "Vote for X" postcard that went straight into your recycling bin. This move treats political communication as a commercial enterprise that should bear its own costs, rather than receiving a government handout.
This legislation is less about policy change and more about fiscal fairness. It levels the playing field by saying, in effect, if you want to use the mail system to influence voters, you need to pay the standard rate, just like everyone else. While political groups might grumble about increased costs, the bill increases transparency by ensuring that the cost of political campaigning is borne directly by the campaigns themselves, rather than being hidden in a discounted postage rate.