The Bring Our Heroes Home Act establishes a process, overseen by a Review Board, to transfer and publicly disclose federal government records concerning U.S. military and civilian personnel missing in action since December 7, 1941, to the National Archives.
Michael "Mike" Crapo
Senator
ID
The Bring Our Heroes Home Act mandates the collection and prompt public disclosure of all U.S. government records concerning Armed Forces and civilian personnel missing since December 7, 1941. It establishes an independent Review Board to oversee the transfer of these records to the National Archives and to rule on any proposed postponements of disclosure. The Act aims to provide the fullest possible accounting to the American public and the families of the missing, with only narrow, clearly defined exceptions to release.
The “Bring Our Heroes Home Act” is a major push for government transparency, aimed squarely at providing answers to the families of missing U.S. service members and civilian personnel. What this bill does, in short, is create a mandatory, time-bound process to declassify and publicly release virtually every federal record related to personnel who went missing between December 7, 1941 (Pearl Harbor) and today. It’s essentially a massive, government-wide records cleanup with a firm deadline.
This legislation establishes the Missing Armed Forces and Civilian Personnel Records Collection at the National Archives. This isn't just about dumping old files; it sets up a system where every government office—from the smallest agency to the White House and the military—must actively search, locate, copy, and transmit all relevant records to the Archivist. The goal is to move these historical documents out of agency vaults and into a central, publicly accessible location. Agencies have strict deadlines: they must begin transmitting records within 270 days of the new Review Board being formed and must complete the transmission of all records within one year. This is a huge undertaking for the agencies, requiring them to dedicate significant resources to records management and certification under penalty of perjury.
The bill creates the Missing Armed Forces and Civilian Personnel Records Review Board, an independent five-member panel appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Think of this Board as the ultimate referee. Their main job is to hear disputes when a government office wants to keep a record secret or heavily redacted. For instance, if the CIA argues that releasing a 1965 intelligence report would harm national security, the Review Board determines if that claim meets the law's very high bar for postponement. This is crucial because it takes the final disclosure decision out of the hands of the agencies that created the records, shifting the power to an independent body.
For the average person, the most important part of this bill is how hard it makes it for the government to withhold information. For records older than 25 years, the agency must provide “clear and convincing evidence” that the risk of disclosure (like revealing a confidential intelligence source or an active war plan) outweighs the public interest. If they want to postpone disclosure beyond a final 10-year deadline, the head of the originating agency must formally recommend it, and the President himself must certify the need for continued secrecy, providing a public justification. This is a significant standard designed to ensure that transparency is the rule, not the exception.
For families of the missing, this bill offers the strongest legal mechanism yet to get definitive answers, forcing agencies to confront decades of secrecy. For historians and researchers, it opens up a massive trove of primary source material. However, there are a couple of practical challenges. The legislation exempts the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) from immediately declassifying records they are actively using to investigate specific cases. While this makes sense to protect ongoing recovery efforts, it could create indefinite delays for those specific case files. Additionally, while the Review Board has broad power, the President retains the ultimate authority to override the Board’s determination on executive branch records. This decision must be made publicly and certified to Congress, but it means the final call on the most sensitive documents remains political. Ultimately, this bill is a major win for transparency, establishing a clear, enforceable path to accountability that respects the public's right to know while attempting to balance necessary national security concerns.