This act establishes federal requirements mandating licensed dealers to conduct background checks for most private firearm transfers between unlicensed individuals.
Christopher Murphy
Senator
CT
The Background Check Expansion Act mandates that nearly all private firearm transfers between unlicensed individuals must go through a licensed dealer to complete a federal background check. This legislation establishes a universal background check requirement for these transactions, with specific exceptions for family gifts and law enforcement transfers. The bill aims to close loopholes in existing firearm transfer laws while explicitly prohibiting the creation of a national firearms registry.
The Background Check Expansion Act sets up a new federal rule that fundamentally changes how private citizens can transfer firearms to one another. Essentially, if you’re not a licensed dealer, you can’t hand a gun to another unlicensed person unless a licensed dealer (known as an FFL) first takes possession of the firearm to conduct a background check. The FFL must treat this transaction just like a sale from their own inventory, ensuring the transferee passes the check under existing law. These requirements kick in 180 days after the bill becomes law.
For most people, the biggest change here is that the days of the simple private sale—say, selling a rifle to a colleague or a neighbor—are over. This bill closes the so-called “private sale loophole” by federalizing the requirement that nearly all transfers must involve a licensed middleman. If you’re selling your old shotgun to a friend, you both now have to meet at an FFL, who will charge a fee, run the check, and handle the necessary paperwork. This introduces a procedural hurdle and a transaction cost where there was none before, which is a real shift for people who lawfully buy and sell firearms privately.
The bill does carve out some important exceptions, recognizing that not every transfer is a commercial transaction. You don't need a background check for a loan or a bona fide gift between immediate family members. This includes spouses, domestic partners, parents, children, siblings, and even grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, and nephews. So, if your dad wants to gift you his hunting rifle, you’re in the clear. Transfers to law enforcement and armed security professionals acting in their official capacity are also exempt.
There’s also a critical exception for temporary transfers “necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm.” This is the emergency clause, designed to cover situations like domestic violence where a person might need a firearm immediately for self-defense. However, the possession must last only as long as “immediately necessary,” which could be a tricky standard to navigate legally when the dust settles.
By forcing all these private transactions through FFLs, the bill essentially creates a new revenue stream for licensed dealers, who will charge fees for acting as the transfer agent. For the average person, this means that what used to be a zero-cost transaction between two adults now comes with a mandatory fee and the inconvenience of coordinating schedules with a third-party business. This is the economic burden—a small cost on paper, but one that adds up and acts as a barrier to simple, legal private transactions.
One significant procedural requirement is that FFLs must notify unlicensed persons about this new universal background check prohibition and have them certify that they received the notice on a form prescribed by the Attorney General. This adds paperwork to the process and ensures people can’t claim ignorance of the new federal rule. Violations of this new provision carry updated penalties under existing federal law.
Crucially, the bill explicitly states that nothing in this Act authorizes the establishment of a national firearms registry. This is a direct attempt to address concerns that mandatory checks could lead to a federal database tracking all firearms and owners. The bill also confirms that states still have the authority to enact their own concurrent or stricter laws on the same subject matter.