This bill amends the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow local governments to use federal funds for the construction of new residential housing for low- and moderate-income persons.
Andy Kim
Senator
NJ
The UNLOCK Housing Act aims to increase the supply of affordable housing by allowing local governments and tribes to use federal funds for the direct construction of new residential housing for low- and moderate-income persons. This amendment to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 expands the eligible uses of these funds. The legislation permits this construction activity with or without the involvement of nonprofit organizations.
Picture this: You’re a city manager, staring at a pile of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds—money intended to help your community. You know you need more affordable housing units, badly. But under the old rules, using that money directly for construction was often a bureaucratic nightmare, usually requiring a partnership with a nonprofit organization just to get the foundation poured. The UNLOCK Housing Act aims to change that.
This legislation, specifically Section 2, is a procedural but powerful amendment to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. It essentially clears the way, stating clearly that metropolitan cities, urban counties, states, and tribal governments receiving these federal funds can now use them directly for constructing new residential housing specifically for low- and moderate-income persons. This is a big deal because it streamlines the process, allowing local governments to move faster on housing projects.
The key change here is flexibility. Before, using CDBG funds for new construction was restrictive, often forcing local entities to work through a third-party nonprofit. While those partnerships are vital, they can slow down projects, especially in areas where housing needs are urgent. The UNLOCK Act explicitly states that this new construction can happen “with or without assistance from a neighborhood-based nonprofit organization or any other private or public nonprofit organization.”
Think about a rapidly growing suburb where rents are skyrocketing. The local government knows exactly where a new apartment complex for essential workers needs to go. This change means they don't have to spend months negotiating a complex partnership agreement; they can potentially use the federal money they already have to start the project themselves or contract it out directly. It puts the building tools straight into the hands of the local authorities.
If you are a low- or moderate-income resident—maybe a teacher, a healthcare aide, or a construction worker—this bill is designed to increase your housing options. The direct result of this legislative tweak is that local governments have a stronger, clearer mandate to increase the actual supply of housing designated for people who need it most. It tackles the core issue of housing affordability by increasing inventory.
For local taxpayers, this means that federal dollars intended for community improvement can be deployed more efficiently to address one of the biggest pain points in modern life: finding an affordable place to live near work. Since the bill is quite clear on its intent and the eligible use of funds, the risk of misinterpretation is low, meaning the money is clearly earmarked for putting roofs over the heads of lower-income families. It’s a straightforward move to unlock local capacity and get more housing built.