PolicyBrief
S. 3163
119th CongressNov 7th 2025
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to seek to engage appropriate officials of Taiwan in a joint program with Taiwan to enable the fielding of uncrewed systems and counter-uncrewed systems capabilities.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates the Secretary of Defense to establish a joint program with Taiwan focused on developing and fielding uncrewed and counter-uncrewed systems capabilities.

Elissa Slotkin
D

Elissa Slotkin

Senator

MI

LEGISLATION

Pentagon Mandated to Launch Joint Drone Co-Development Program with Taiwan by March 2026

If you’re tracking global security—or just the supply chain for your next electronic gadget—you know that the relationship between the US and Taiwan is a big deal. This new bill cuts straight to the chase, mandating a specific, high-tech defense partnership designed to accelerate the deployment of modern military capabilities.

The Drone-Age Partnership

This legislation directs the Secretary of Defense, working alongside the State Department, to establish a joint program with Taiwan by March 1, 2026. The mission is focused entirely on uncrewed systems (think military drones) and counter-uncrewed systems (think anti-drone technology). This isn't just a handshake agreement; the bill explicitly requires co-development and co-production of these systems, aligning with the existing Taiwan Relations Act. Essentially, this is a directive to put the US and Taiwan defense industries in the same room to build cutting-edge tech together. For the defense industrial base, this means new contracts and collaboration opportunities, potentially accelerating the development cycle for US companies by integrating them into a critical supply chain.

Building the Foundation, Brick by Tech Brick

To make this joint program work, the bill recognizes that the two partners need a solid legal and operational foundation. It requires the Secretary of Defense to report on the progress of finalizing several key defense trade agreements. These aren't minor details—they’re the paperwork that dictates how two countries share sensitive military information and equipment. The required agreements include:

  • Reciprocal Defense Procurement: Who buys what from whom, and how.
  • Security of Supply Agreement: Ensuring that critical parts and materials keep flowing, even in a crisis.
  • Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement: The operational logistics of sharing supplies and services (like fuel or maintenance).
  • General Security of Military Information Agreement: The rules for keeping classified information classified.
  • Cyber Maturity Model Certification: Ensuring both sides meet modern cybersecurity standards.

These foundational agreements are the bedrock for any deep military partnership. By mandating annual reports on the progress of these agreements through 2029, Congress is signaling that it wants this relationship formalized and locked down, not just a temporary project.

What It Means for Oversight and Implementation

The Secretary of Defense is authorized to use existing legal authorities (like those in title 10, United States Code) to carry out this joint program. This means the resources and legal framework are already there; the bill simply provides the mandate and the deadline. To keep tabs on the progress, the Secretary must submit the first report to Congress within 180 days of the bill becoming law, followed by annual reports through 2029. These reports must detail the engagements, the actions taken to field the systems, and identify any extra resources or authorities needed to succeed. This mandatory, multi-year reporting structure ensures that the program can’t stall out—Congress will be checking the homework regularly.

For the busy person, the takeaway is clear: this bill is a direct move to modernize a critical security relationship by focusing on the most relevant technology of the decade—drones and counter-drones. While the bill is specific about what needs to happen (co-development of systems) and when (by March 2026), the implementation details—like who pays for what in the co-production phase, or how exactly those foundational agreements will be structured—are left to the Department of Defense to figure out. The success of this effort hinges on how quickly and effectively the US and Taiwan can finalize that crucial paperwork.