This Act updates emergency watershed programs, revises federal funding for rehabilitating aging flood control structures, and expands the purposes of the Regional Conservation Partnership Program to enhance flood and drought resilience.
Pete Ricketts
Senator
NE
The Flood Protection and Infrastructure Resilience Act of 2025 aims to enhance national resilience against flooding and environmental challenges. It grants the Secretary authority to implement higher-level watershed restoration measures when in the long-term interest of the area. The bill also revises federal funding structures for rehabilitating aging infrastructure, increasing support for limited resource areas. Finally, it updates the purposes of the Regional Conservation Partnership Program to prioritize regional-scale natural resource concerns, including flood and drought mitigation.
The Flood Protection and Infrastructure Resilience Act of 2025 is a major update to how the government handles aging flood control structures and watershed conservation. Essentially, the bill gives the Secretary of Agriculture new authority to go above and beyond the minimum required fixes during emergency watershed repairs, provided it benefits the long-term health of the watershed and prevents future issues (Section 2).
More critically for communities, it changes the federal funding rules for rehabilitating flood control structures that are at or past their expected lifespan. While the standard federal contribution remains 65% of the total rehabilitation cost, the bill creates a significant exception: for projects in areas designated as “limited resource areas,” the federal share can jump up to 90% of the total rehabilitation costs (Section 3). In all cases, the federal contribution cannot exceed 100% of the actual construction costs.
Think about the last time a major storm ripped through your area, causing flooding and damage to local streams or dams. Right now, emergency programs usually focus on fixing the immediate problem. This bill changes that by allowing for proactive, long-term thinking. Under Section 2, the Secretary can now implement measures that increase the level of protection beyond just addressing the immediate damage. This means instead of just patching a hole, they could potentially upgrade the entire structure or surrounding area to withstand the next, bigger storm. This is a smart move for long-term resilience, saving money and heartache down the road. However, the authority hinges on the Secretary’s determination of what’s in the “best interest of the long-term health,” which is a pretty broad term that could lead to some discretionary spending decisions.
Section 3 is where the rubber meets the road for local governments and utility districts. Many of the dams and flood control structures built decades ago are reaching the end of their useful lives. Repairing them is expensive. The standard 65% federal contribution helps, but the 90% funding boost for “limited resource areas” is a game-changer for smaller, less wealthy communities. If you live in a rural area struggling to meet infrastructure needs, this increase could be the difference between a critical repair happening now or being delayed for years.
But here’s the catch, and it’s a big one for local organizations: While the federal government is footing more of the construction bill, the local organization is explicitly required to cover all the costs associated with obtaining water, mineral, and other resource rights, as well as all required Federal, State, and local permits (Section 3). For a small municipality or watershed district, these costs—the legal fees, the environmental studies, the permitting process—can be a huge, unbudgeted financial barrier, even if construction itself is 90% covered. It’s like getting a great deal on a car but having to pay full price for the insurance, registration, and gas for the next decade upfront.
Finally, the bill updates the goals of the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) to be more comprehensive (Section 4). This program, which helps coordinate conservation efforts across large areas, now explicitly focuses on addressing natural resource concerns at a regional or watershed scale. The revised purposes now specifically include the conservation and protection of drinking water sources and groundwater, and the prevention and mitigation of flooding and drought, with an emphasis on improving or expanding flood resiliency.
This shift means that RCPP funds are now clearly directed toward projects that protect the water coming out of your tap and make your community safer from high water events. For farmers, landowners, and regional planning groups, this signals a clearer path for securing funding for projects that manage water resources holistically, from the soil on a field to the groundwater supplying a city.