The TRAFFIC Act of 2025 permanently disqualifies individuals convicted of human trafficking violations from obtaining various transportation-related licenses and certificates.
Marsha Blackburn
Senator
TN
The TRAFFIC Act of 2025 establishes permanent disqualification from holding various transportation-related licenses and certificates for individuals convicted of human trafficking violations. This applies across sectors including maritime, rail, commercial driving, and aviation. The legislation mandates that federal authorities deny or revoke credentials for those convicted of offenses related to human trafficking under federal, state, local, or tribal law.
The TRAFFIC Act of 2025 is a straightforward but heavy-hitting piece of legislation. In short, it mandates the permanent disqualification from holding professional transportation licenses for anyone convicted of a human trafficking offense. This isn’t a temporary suspension or a five-year ban; it’s a lifetime career killer for people in major transportation industries.
Specifically, the bill targets licenses for commercial drivers (CDLs), locomotive operators, train conductors, pilots, and merchant seamen. If you’re found guilty of a federal human trafficking crime (under chapter 77 of title 18) or anything deemed “substantially similar” under state, local, or tribal law, you are permanently barred from holding these credentials. The goal is clear: remove convicted traffickers from the nation’s transportation infrastructure.
This bill doesn't just focus on federal convictions. The language repeatedly includes the phrase “or a substantially similar offense under any other Federal, State, local, or Tribal law.” This is where the rubber meets the road, and the potential for confusion starts.
For example, if you’re a long-haul trucker with a CDL, a conviction for a specific state-level offense—one that a state court might classify differently than a federal court—could still trigger this permanent federal disqualification if the licensing body decides it’s “substantially similar” to the federal trafficking statute. This vagueness means that the people running the licensing offices will have significant power to decide which state convictions are severe enough to end someone's career forever. It introduces an element of uncertainty for anyone with a past conviction that touches on these issues, even if it wasn't explicitly labeled as a federal trafficking crime.
The TRAFFIC Act goes beyond the typical licenses. It includes a broad provision that gives the Secretaries of Transportation (DOT) and Homeland Security (DHS) the authority to apply this permanent disqualification to any other license, certificate, or document they issue that relates to operating a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel.
Think about the sheer number of specialized jobs that require a DOT or DHS document: port workers, specialized freight handlers, air traffic controllers, or perhaps even drone operators down the line. If you’re convicted of the specified offense, the relevant Secretary can permanently yank that authorization, even if it’s not one of the specific licenses listed in the main sections. This ensures that a human trafficking conviction acts as a permanent, industry-wide black mark across nearly every regulated transportation job.
On the one hand, the bill aims to increase safety and security by removing individuals convicted of severe crimes from positions that involve constant movement across the country and potentially vulnerable populations. For the general public, knowing that convicted traffickers are permanently barred from these roles is a clear benefit.
However, the permanent nature of the ban is a heavy hammer. It offers no pathway for rehabilitation or restoration of rights, regardless of how much time has passed or what an individual has done to change their life. For someone who has served their time and paid their debt to society, this bill ensures their career in transportation is over, full stop. The combination of a permanent ban and the vague “substantially similar” language means that the consequences of a conviction are not just severe, but absolute and potentially subject to broad interpretation by different federal agencies.