This Act prohibits the use of federal funds in fiscal year 2026 for nuclear weapons test explosions that produce a measurable yield, while allowing for zero-yield stockpile stewardship activities.
Edward "Ed" Markey
Senator
MA
The No Nuclear Testing Act of 2025 prohibits the use of federal funds in fiscal year 2026 for any nuclear weapons test explosion that produces a measurable yield. This measure maintains the current ban on explosive testing while allowing for zero-yield stockpile stewardship activities to continue.
The "No Nuclear Testing Act of 2025" is about drawing a hard line on nuclear weapons testing—at least for the next fiscal year. This bill explicitly bans the use of any federal money authorized for Fiscal Year 2026, or even leftover funds from prior years, for conducting or preparing for any nuclear weapons test explosion that produces a “measurable yield.” In plain English, the government is telling its agencies: no more live, boom-making nuclear tests on our dime next year.
For anyone concerned about global stability or the environmental impact of nuclear testing, this bill is a clear signal. The core of Section 2 is a budgetary restriction that reinforces the long-standing U.S. moratorium on nuclear testing. It’s a clean, simple prohibition that targets the wallet, ensuring that the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense can’t sneak in funds for a test explosion that actually, well, explodes with force. While this might seem like a given, codifying this restriction into law every year is how Congress keeps the policy locked in.
Now, here’s the critical fine print. The bill is not stopping all nuclear-related activities. It includes a key exception for “Stockpile Stewardship.” This is the ongoing, highly technical work the U.S. does to maintain the safety, security, and reliability of its existing nuclear arsenal without conducting full-scale explosions. Think of it like maintaining a very old, very complex car engine without ever turning it on—you’re using advanced diagnostics and simulations to make sure it still works perfectly.
Crucially, this stewardship work must meet the “zero-yield standard.” This means that while experiments and preparations are allowed, they cannot result in any measurable nuclear energy release. This is the technical boundary that keeps the testing ban effective. For the physicists and engineers working in this field, the bill simply maintains the status quo: keep the stockpile safe, but keep the testing non-explosive. For the rest of us, it means the government can continue to ensure the deterrent is functional without the risk, cost, and international fallout of a live test.
This legislation primarily impacts the few specialized government labs and contractors involved in nuclear weapons maintenance and research. For them, it tightens the belt on what kind of research they can pursue, confirming that high-yield testing is off the table for FY 2026. If you’re a taxpayer, this bill provides a clear, transparent restriction on how your money is spent, preventing funding from being diverted toward activities that could destabilize international arms control efforts.
Because the bill is so specific about the zero-yield standard and only restricts funds for one fiscal year, its vagueness level is low. It’s a straightforward budgetary tool that signals continued commitment to non-proliferation. The main challenge, as always, lies in the technical oversight: ensuring that the “zero-yield” activities permitted under the stewardship exception truly do not cross the line into “measurable yield” testing, a distinction that requires constant, vigilant auditing of highly classified scientific data.