This bill mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to reimburse states for the costs incurred while operating the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during periods of lapsed federal funding, provided the state complied with federal law.
Lisa Blunt Rochester
Senator
DE
The SNAP BACK Act of 2025 mandates that the Secretary of Agriculture reimburse states for the costs incurred while operating the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during any period when federal funding for the program lapsed. This reimbursement is contingent upon the state having administered SNAP in accordance with federal law during the lapse.
When Congress hits a funding snag and the federal government shuts down, it’s not just museums that close. Critical programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—the program formerly known as food stamps—can face serious funding gaps. This is where states often step in, using their own money to keep the program running so families can still buy groceries. The SNAP BACK Act of 2025 is designed to make sure states don’t get stuck holding the bill for that.
This bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to reimburse states for any costs they incur while operating SNAP during a federal funding lapse. Think of it like this: If the federal government can’t agree on a budget and the money for SNAP dries up, a state might dip into its emergency funds to keep benefits flowing. This legislation ensures the feds pay that money back. The only condition? The state must have operated the program according to existing federal law—the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008—during that gap. This is a straightforward fix aimed at keeping the grocery money flowing, regardless of Washington's gridlock.
For the average person, this provision is an insurance policy against political dysfunction. When the government shuts down, it creates massive uncertainty for the millions of Americans who rely on SNAP to feed their families. States, facing the choice between letting people go hungry and draining their own budgets, often choose the latter. This bill removes the financial penalty for doing the right thing. Because the reimbursement is mandatory, states have a clear expectation that they will be made whole, reducing the pressure to cut services or delay payments during a crisis. This small change makes the entire social safety net more resilient.
This provision directly addresses a known vulnerability in government operations. Without this guarantee, state budgets take a hit every time there’s a funding lapse. That money—which could have been used for local infrastructure, schools, or healthcare—is instead tied up covering federal obligations. The SNAP BACK Act prevents this diversion of funds. By ensuring states are promptly reimbursed, the bill stabilizes state finances and, crucially, ensures that SNAP recipients—whether they are working parents, seniors, or people with disabilities—can continue to use their benefits without interruption. It’s a simple, low-vagueness measure that adds a layer of fiscal responsibility and continuity to a program that millions depend on for their next meal.