This bill aims to reduce out-of-pocket costs and remove utilization management hurdles for specific, qualifying non-opioid chronic pain management drugs under Medicare Part D.
Steve Daines
Senator
MT
The Relief of Chronic Pain Act of 2025 aims to improve access to specific non-opioid treatments for chronic pain under Medicare Part D. This bill eliminates deductibles and limits cost-sharing for qualifying non-opioid chronic pain management drugs starting in 2026. Furthermore, it prohibits Medicare Part D plans from imposing step therapy or prior authorization requirements for these specific non-opioid pain medications.
If you or someone you know manages chronic pain, you know the drill: dealing with the pain itself is hard enough, but navigating insurance hurdles and high drug costs can be a nightmare. The Relief of Chronic Pain Act of 2025 is trying to change that, specifically for Medicare Part D enrollees, by slashing costs and cutting red tape for certain non-opioid treatments starting in 2026.
This bill is laser-focused on making specific non-opioid drugs used to treat chronic pain much easier to get. The core action? For qualifying drugs, the Medicare Part D deductible will not apply, and the drug must be placed on the plan’s lowest cost-sharing tier. This means lower out-of-pocket costs right out of the gate for seniors and disabled individuals relying on these treatments. Think of it as hitting the fast-forward button past the deductible and getting the best possible price on your co-pay.
Not every pain reliever will get this VIP treatment. The bill creates a very specific definition for a “qualifying non-opioid chronic pain management drug.” It has to be FDA-approved specifically for chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, or endometriosis. Crucially, it must not act on the body’s opioid receptors, and it needs to be the only drug of its kind on the market (meaning no therapeutically equivalent generics or alternatives are sold). Finally, its wholesale cost must fall below a certain monthly threshold set by the Secretary, which introduces a bit of administrative vagueness we’ll need to watch.
Why the strict definition? This bill is clearly designed to promote access to innovative, non-addictive treatments, aligning with public health efforts to curb opioid reliance. By focusing on drugs without equivalents, it ensures that this cost relief targets unique, often newer, treatments.
Perhaps the biggest win for patients is buried in Section 3, which addresses utilization management. For these qualifying non-opioid drugs, Medicare Part D plans (both standard PDPs and MAPD plans) are prohibited from using step therapy or prior authorization.
For a patient dealing with debilitating pain, these administrative delays can be agonizing. Eliminating them means quicker, less stressful access to the treatment recommended by their physician. If you’re a retired construction worker with neuropathic pain, this means less time fighting paperwork and more time managing your actual condition.
While the relief for patients is clear, the financial burden shifts. By eliminating the deductible and mandating the lowest cost-sharing tier, the bill essentially transfers those costs onto the Part D plans themselves (and, indirectly, to taxpayers and potentially all plan members through slightly higher premiums). The plans—the PDPs and MAPD plans—lose two of their primary tools (step therapy and prior authorization) for managing costs and ensuring patients use the most cost-effective treatments. They’ll have to absorb the full cost of these specific, often expensive, non-opioid drugs.
Overall, this legislation is a major step toward making non-opioid chronic pain management affordable and accessible for Medicare beneficiaries. It’s a clear signal that policy is moving toward prioritizing innovative, non-addictive treatments over traditional, often cheaper, alternatives, even if it means a higher price tag for the insurance providers.