This Act mandates that VA medical facilities partner with rural medical facilities to improve care access and lower costs for rural veterans.
Tammy Duckworth
Senator
IL
The Improving Access to Care for Rural Veterans Act mandates that all Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities establish partnerships with local rural medical facilities to enhance care access and lower costs for rural veterans. These agreements can cover services like telehealth, shared resources, and care coordination. The Secretary must report to Congress on implementation and the success of these partnerships in improving veteran accessibility every two years. Existing facilities must comply with this requirement or obtain a waiver within three years of enactment.
The “Improving Access to Care for Rural Veterans Act” cuts straight to the chase: it requires every Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facility to establish a formal partnership with a medical facility located in a rural area. The goal is simple and necessary—get quality healthcare closer to the veterans who need it most, while also working to lower costs for both the VA and the partner facilities.
Think of this as a required handshake across the county line. This isn't just a suggestion; it’s a hard mandate laid out in Section 2. These partnerships can cover a huge range of things, from setting up telehealth services to sharing expensive equipment or clinical space. For a veteran in a remote area who currently drives three hours to a VA hospital, this could mean suddenly having access to VA-coordinated care right at their local clinic. The bill specifically states that these agreements are meant to coordinate patient care, handle emergency services, and provide training, ensuring the partnership is functional, not just ceremonial.
Existing VA facilities have a tight deadline: they must be compliant—meaning they have a partnership in place—within three years of the bill becoming law. New VA facilities get three years from the day they open their doors. This puts a clear timeline on improving access, which is great for the nearly five million veterans currently living in rural America.
What if a VA facility can’t find a suitable partner, or the logistics just don't work? Section 2 allows the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to grant a waiver, essentially a temporary pass from the requirement. However, this isn't a free pass. The waiver can only last for up to five years, and the Secretary must notify Congress at least 48 hours before it goes into effect. If the facility needs to renew that waiver after five years, the Secretary has to conduct a review and confirm that the waiver is “truly necessary.” This adds a layer of scrutiny, preventing facilities from ignoring the mandate indefinitely.
For those of us who like to see the receipts, the bill includes strong accountability measures. The VA Secretary is required to brief Congress within 180 days on exactly how they plan to roll this out. More importantly, every two years after implementation starts, the VA must report back on the success of these partnerships. This report has to compare the number of veterans enrolled in VA care and the overall accessibility of services before and after the partnerships started. This mechanism is designed to make sure the program actually moves the needle on veteran care, not just creates paperwork.
The clear winners here are rural veterans and the local community clinics (defined using the standard USDA Rural-Urban Commuting Areas coding system) that stand to gain resources and stability through these formal collaborations. By requiring shared resources and coordinated care, the bill aims to fix a chronic problem of distance and capacity in rural healthcare.
On the flip side, the VA facilities that have to implement this are going to face a significant administrative lift. For them, the three-year clock is ticking, and establishing these complex legal and operational agreements takes real effort. The main concern, though minor, lies in that waiver renewal process. While Congress gets notified of the initial waiver, the criteria for the Secretary to decide if a five-year renewal is “truly necessary” isn't explicitly defined. This leaves some wiggle room for subjective judgment, which could potentially allow a facility to stay perpetually waived if the oversight isn't rigorous. Overall, however, this bill is a direct and much-needed attempt to close the healthcare gap for veterans who live far from major medical centers.