The ENFORCE Act clarifies the crime of producing child pornography and strengthens federal enforcement against obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse by eliminating the statute of limitations for prosecution and imposing mandatory sex offender registration and pretrial detention.
John Cornyn
Senator
TX
The ENFORCE Act aims to strengthen federal laws against child exploitation. It clarifies the crime of producing child pornography and significantly enhances enforcement against obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. Key provisions include removing the statute of limitations for related offenses, requiring sex offender registration for those convicted, and establishing a presumption of detention before trial.
The Enhancing Necessary Federal Offenses Regarding Child Exploitation Act, or the ENFORCE Act, is a legislative package focused on strengthening federal criminal laws against child sexual abuse material. At its core, the bill clarifies the definition of producing child pornography, ensuring that the existing severe penalties apply, and critically, it removes the statute of limitations for prosecuting certain related offenses. This means that for crimes involving obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse, federal prosecutors would no longer be constrained by time limits, potentially allowing them to bring charges decades after the fact.
Section 2 of the bill cleans up the definition of the crime of producing child pornography (amending 18 U.S.C. 2252A). Previously, the law required a clear link to interstate commerce. This bill makes that link explicit and broad, stating that the crime is committed if the person knows the pornography will be mailed or shipped across state lines, or if the material itself was produced using materials that traveled in interstate commerce (think computers, cameras, or internet service). For the average person, this provision confirms that anyone knowingly involved in the creation of this material, regardless of where they are physically located, is firmly within the scope of federal prosecution, applying existing high-level penalties for these offenses.
The most significant change for the criminal justice system comes in Section 3, which targets offenses related to obscene visual depictions of child sexual abuse (18 U.S.C. 1466A). The bill removes the statute of limitations entirely for prosecuting these crimes. For context, most federal crimes have a five-year limit. Eliminating this limit means law enforcement can pursue these cases whenever the evidence surfaces, regardless of how much time has passed. This is a major win for accountability, ensuring that perpetrators of these specific, severe crimes cannot simply wait out the clock.
Section 3 also tightens the screws on individuals charged under 18 U.S.C. 1466A in several ways. First, it mandates that anyone convicted of this offense must register as a sex offender under the Adam Walsh Act. Second, it requires a term of supervised release after they complete their prison sentence, meaning they won't just walk free after serving time—they’ll be monitored. Third, and perhaps most impactful for due process, the bill creates a legal presumption that a person charged with this crime must be detained before trial. While this presumption can be challenged in court, it shifts the burden: instead of the government having to prove why the defendant should be held, the defendant must prove why they should be released. This is a significant restriction on the right to pretrial liberty, designed to keep those accused of these serious crimes off the streets while they await trial.
Finally, the bill addresses evidence handling. It adds a provision requiring that any visual depiction used as evidence in these cases must remain in the custody of the government or the court. This is a technical but necessary step to secure sensitive evidence. Crucially, it also allows any identifiable minor depicted in the visual material to have access to it, mirroring existing provisions for victims of child pornography. This ensures that the victims themselves have the right to review the evidence related to the crime committed against them, a critical detail for victim rights.