The Campus Accountability and Safety Act overhauls campus crime reporting under the Clery Act, mandates enhanced survivor support through specialized campus staff, and increases federal transparency regarding campus safety enforcement.
Kirsten Gillibrand
Senator
NY
The Campus Accountability and Safety Act significantly overhauls the Clery Act by mandating more detailed, transparent crime reporting, especially concerning student-involved sex crimes. It establishes new requirements for colleges to appoint trauma-informed specialists to support survivors of sexual and interpersonal violence. Furthermore, the bill requires the Department of Education to create a public website tracking campus safety enforcement actions and enhances federal grant programs to explicitly include sexual harassment as a covered crime.
The Campus Accountability and Safety Act is a major shakeup of how colleges handle sexual and domestic violence cases, significantly amending the federal Clery Act and Title IX requirements. Essentially, this bill forces universities to be far more transparent about campus crime and mandates a completely new level of support for survivors. It’s a huge win for accountability, but it’s going to mean a lot of administrative work—and financial risk—for institutions.
If you’ve ever tried to find your school’s annual campus security report, you know it can feel like searching for a needle in a bureaucratic haystack. This bill fixes that by requiring schools to make their safety reports easy to find, accessible online, and even offered in multiple languages. Crucially, the list of reportable crimes schools must track is expanding to explicitly include specific sex offenses like rape, fondling, incest, and statutory rape, using standardized definitions from the FBI and the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). This means the numbers you see on campus crime reports should be much more consistent and comprehensive across the board.
Here’s where the bill takes a significant step toward accountability. Starting one year after enactment, colleges must prepare a detailed annual breakdown of student-involved sex crimes (rape and fondling). This isn't just about counting reports; it’s about tracking the entire campus disciplinary pipeline. Think of it like a dashboard for justice: schools must report how many cases went to the Title IX coordinator, how many victims requested disciplinary action, how many cases actually went through the formal process, and the final outcome (found responsible, not responsible, or dropped because the accused quit school). For busy parents or students choosing a college, this data provides a crucial look at whether a school is just checking boxes or actually seeing cases through to resolution.
Perhaps the biggest change for students is the requirement for every college to appoint one or more sexual and interpersonal violence specialists. These aren't just counselors; they are designated contacts who must provide victim-centered, trauma-informed support and information. They are the go-to resource for survivors, helping them navigate their rights, reporting options (including local police), and academic or housing accommodations. Importantly, these specialists cannot be undergraduate students, the Title IX coordinator, or anyone involved in the investigation or discipline process. They report to someone outside the disciplinary group, creating a critical firewall to ensure the survivor's support is separate from the school's investigation.
The Department of Education (DOE) is required to launch a new, user-friendly website that tracks safety data and, critically, the DOE’s own enforcement actions. This site will list the status of Title IX investigations, findings letters, and final decisions for every college. If a school is under the microscope for mishandling sexual harassment complaints, the public will know. For colleges, the stakes are high: failure to meet the new specialist or policy requirements could result in a civil penalty of up to 1% of the school's operating budget for each year of non-compliance. For a major university, that penalty could be devastating, making compliance a top-tier financial priority.
For students, this bill standardizes support, ensures clearer access to resources, and mandates a single, uniform disciplinary process for all related offenses—meaning no more special treatment based on whether the accused is an athlete or a star student. For colleges, the administrative burden is significant. They must implement new training programs covering everything from consent to the neurobiology of trauma and ensure all staff involved in grievance procedures complete it. While the goal is improved safety and justice, institutions face a steep learning curve and the immediate financial pressure of avoiding the new, substantial penalties.