This Act raises the investor limit to 500 and increases the asset threshold to \$50 million for certain investment companies to qualify for exemptions under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Jerry Moran
Senator
KS
The Expanding American Entrepreneurship Act modifies the Investment Company Act of 1940 to ease regulatory burdens on certain investment companies. This bill increases the maximum number of investors allowed before registration is required, raising the limit from 250 to 500 persons. Additionally, it significantly raises the asset threshold for a specific regulatory exemption from \$10 million to \$50 million.
The Expanding American Entrepreneurship Act is making some significant changes to who gets regulated in the world of private investment. Specifically, Section 2 of this bill rewrites two key thresholds under the Investment Company Act of 1940, allowing certain investment funds to grow much larger without being subject to the full regulatory requirements that public companies face.
Think of this bill as raising the speed limit for private funds before they have to stop and register with the SEC. Currently, a private fund can avoid full public registration if it has 250 or fewer investors. This bill more than doubles that count, allowing these funds to have up to 500 persons (investors) before the full regulatory hammer drops (SEC. 2).
Even more impactful is the change to the asset threshold. Right now, to qualify for a specific regulatory exemption, a fund can manage up to $10 million in assets. This bill dramatically increases that limit to $50 million (SEC. 2). Essentially, a fund can now manage five times the capital—up to $50 million—while still operating under a lighter regulatory touch. For the fund managers, this is a huge win, reducing compliance costs and administrative headaches.
These changes are designed to make it easier for smaller and mid-sized private investment funds to grow and deploy capital, which could be good for fostering entrepreneurship. Imagine a venture capital fund that wants to raise $40 million to invest in local tech startups. Under the old rules, they might have hit a regulatory wall that forced them into costly compliance measures, or they’d have to cap their fundraising. Now, they have the headroom to raise the full amount and operate more efficiently.
However, there’s a real trade-off here. The full regulatory framework of the Investment Company Act of 1940 exists to protect investors by requiring transparency and accountability. By allowing funds to manage up to $50 million and include up to 500 investors before triggering these protections, the bill significantly reduces regulatory oversight for a much larger pool of private capital. If you’re an investor in one of these funds—even if you’re a high-net-worth individual—you’re relying on less regulatory scrutiny for a larger amount of money.
For the busy person, the key takeaway is that the government is making a calculated bet: that the benefit of freeing up capital and reducing compliance costs for investment managers outweighs the risk of reduced oversight. If these funds take on more risk, or if poor management occurs, the investors now have fewer federal protections backing them up, especially compared to what’s required of a fully registered public company. The bill essentially shifts the regulatory line in the sand, benefiting fund managers by giving them more room to operate, but potentially exposing investors to more risk without the full disclosure requirements that used to kick in at the $10 million mark.