PolicyBrief
S. 2890
119th CongressSep 18th 2025
Generating Resilient, Environmentally Exceptional National Streets Act
IN COMMITTEE

The GREEN Streets Act mandates that states prioritize climate change mitigation, infrastructure resilience, and reduced vehicle miles traveled in their road performance measures, while imposing strict analysis and investment requirements for capacity-expanding projects that increase emissions.

Edward "Ed" Markey
D

Edward "Ed" Markey

Senator

MA

LEGISLATION

The 'GREEN Streets Act' Forces States to Cut Driving and Emissions or Lose Highway Funds

The Generating Resilient, Environmentally Exceptional National Streets Act, or the GREEN Streets Act, is a massive overhaul of how the federal government measures and funds state highway systems. Simply put, this bill tells states that their roads need to start focusing less on moving cars and more on fighting climate change and extreme weather. It specifically mandates that the Secretary of Transportation establish minimum standards for states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and cut down on the miles people drive per person (Vehicle Miles Traveled, or VMT). If a state doesn't hit these new federal emission targets, it faces mandatory budget redirection.

The New Rules of the Road: Climate First

Under this bill, the federal government is adding climate change and resilience as core goals for all public roads (Sec. 2). This means state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) can no longer just focus on filling potholes and minimizing congestion. They must now set minimum standards to lower VMT, promote non-car travel (like biking, walking, and transit), and make roads tougher against floods and extreme weather. For the average commuter, this is the policy signal that future infrastructure dollars are going heavily toward transit and bike lanes, potentially at the expense of expanding car lanes.

The Capacity Crunch: Why Adding a Lane Just Got Harder

If you live in a growing metro area, you know the debate about adding a lane to the highway. This bill throws a massive hurdle in front of those projects, especially if they use federal funds (Sec. 3). Before any state or metropolitan planning organization (MPO) can build a new lane for single-occupancy cars, they have to jump through several hoops. They must prove, publicly, that the new lane is a better deal—based on a cost-benefit analysis—than simply improving bus service or optimizing the existing road. They also have to analyze the project's impact on VMT, emissions, and environmental justice communities. Essentially, if you want to add a lane, you now have to prove that adding a bus rapid transit line wouldn't solve the problem better. This new analytical burden means road expansion projects will take longer and face much stricter scrutiny.

The Non-Compliance Penalty: Mandatory Budget Cuts

Here’s the part that hits state budgets hard: if a state fails to meet the Secretary’s new minimum standards for reducing public road greenhouse gas emissions, they get put in financial penalty box (Sec. 4). The state must immediately dedicate a huge chunk of its core federal highway funding—specifically, 33% of its main highway funds and 10% of its other major federal road funds—toward projects designed to meet those emission targets. This mandatory redirection continues every year, with the penalty increasing by 2% annually, until the Secretary decides the state is compliant. For state DOTs, this is a major concern. It means if they can’t meet the federal climate goals, they could be forced to divert money intended for routine maintenance or other priority projects toward transit or bike lanes instead.

Transit Gets a New Report Card

Finally, the bill introduces new federal metrics for public transit in large metro areas (Sec. 5). The Secretary must now set national standards for “First Last Mile Accessibility” (how easy it is to get from your home to the bus stop), “Transit Accessibility” (how many key destinations you can reach in 45 minutes), and “Transit Mode Share” (the percentage of trips taken by transit). Major metro areas must set goals for these metrics within 180 days of the standards being set. This is good news for transit riders, as it forces planning organizations to focus on making the entire trip—from your door to your destination—easier, not just the bus ride itself. It also means local governments will need to track and report on things like the percentage of their roads with sidewalks and bike lanes, tying land use and pedestrian infrastructure directly to federal transit funding.