PolicyBrief
S. 2778
119th CongressSep 11th 2025
Local School Foods Expansion Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act expands the federal program for schools to procure domestically grown, unprocessed fruits and vegetables, increasing funding and setting new requirements for supporting local and disadvantaged farmers.

Ron Wyden
D

Ron Wyden

Senator

OR

LEGISLATION

Local School Foods Act Boosts Farmer Support with $25M Annual Budget, Expands Farm-to-School Programs

The new Local School Foods Expansion Act of 2025 is essentially taking a successful farm-to-school experiment and making it official—and bigger. This legislation transforms what was a small pilot project into a full-blown federal program designed to get more domestically grown, unprocessed fruits and vegetables onto school lunch trays across the country. It’s not just a name change; it comes with real money and real requirements.

Turning Pilots into Policy: What’s Changing?

First, the scale is increasing. The program is expanding its reach from 8 states to 14, meaning more communities will be able to participate. For those of us juggling busy work schedules and trying to keep our kids fed, this means a better chance that the apple or carrot sticks on the school lunch line are fresher and locally sourced. Crucially, the bill mandates that states applying to join must show exactly how they plan to support small, local, and socially disadvantaged farmers, including Tribal agricultural producers who use traditional foods. This isn’t just about feeding kids; it’s about directing federal dollars toward strengthening local food economies.

The Money Trail: $25 Million Annually for Five Years

This isn't a program relying on loose change. The Act dedicates a significant $25 million every year from fiscal year 2026 through 2030. Think of it as stable, guaranteed income for this initiative. Out of that annual pot, a hefty $10 million is specifically earmarked for administrative and technical support for the participating states. This funding is critical because running a farm-to-school program is complicated—it requires coordinating between schools, farmers, and distributors. This money is designed to grease those administrative wheels, helping schools find and certify local vendors and ensuring farmers, especially smaller operations, can navigate the paperwork.

Every state selected to participate is guaranteed a minimum of $500,000 for these administrative costs. This ensures that even smaller states or those with complex logistical challenges have the resources to make the program work. If fewer than 14 states participate, the bill even sets aside an extra $1 million to provide technical assistance to non-participating states, helping them get ready to join the program later. It’s a clear effort to expand participation over time.

Accountability and the Fine Print

This bill doesn’t just hand out checks; it demands proof of performance. The rules for recordkeeping and evaluation are getting significantly tighter. The Secretary must conduct a full evaluation within two years of the law’s enactment. This evaluation needs to track specific details: how many fruits and vegetables were bought, the cost, and the economic effect on local farmers. They also have to look closely at barriers to participation, such as administrative hurdles or issues getting farmers approved as vendors. This is good news for taxpayers because it means the program will be judged on concrete results, not just good intentions. If the process is too clunky for a small, busy farmer to join, the government will be required to identify and fix that problem.

For local food distributors who don't specialize in local or unprocessed goods, this bill could mean a slight shift in the market as schools are incentivized to buy directly from farms. But for the small, local farmer—the one who maybe couldn't compete with massive industrial operations before—this bill creates a new, reliable market right in their backyard, potentially leading to more stable planning and growth. It’s a policy that aims to benefit both the health of students and the financial health of small-scale agriculture.