This bill modifies Medicare Part D cost-sharing for specific chronic care drugs by basing out-of-pocket expenses on the drug's net price after the deductible begins in 2027.
John Cornyn
Senator
TX
The Share the Savings with Seniors Act aims to lower out-of-pocket costs for seniors taking specific, long-term chronic care medications under Medicare Part D, beginning in 2027. This bill mandates that cost-sharing for these drugs, once the deductible is met, must be calculated based on the drug's net price rather than the retail price. These changes apply to drugs treating conditions like diabetes and certain respiratory or cardiovascular issues.
The aptly named “Share the Savings with Seniors Act” is looking to change the game for Medicare Part D beneficiaries, specifically those managing long-term health issues. Starting in 2027, this legislation mandates a major shift in how much seniors pay out-of-pocket for certain chronic care drugs. Essentially, it aims to ensure that when you hit the pharmacy counter, your share of the cost actually reflects the real price of the drug, not just the sticker price.
Right now, many Part D plans calculate your coinsurance (the percentage you pay) based on the drug’s high list price, even though the plan or its Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) might have negotiated massive rebates and discounts from the manufacturer. This bill, covered under Section 2, changes that for specific chronic care medications—like those used for blood sugar regulation (excluding insulin), certain respiratory conditions, and anticoagulants. Once a senior has met their annual deductible, their coinsurance for these drugs must be based on the “net price.” Think of the net price as the price after all those manufacturer discounts and concessions have been factored in. For a senior managing a chronic condition, this could mean significant savings, ensuring they benefit directly from the discounts their plan secured.
Imagine you take an expensive maintenance drug that has a $1,000 list price, but the plan gets a $400 rebate, making the net price $600. If your coinsurance is 25%, under the old system, you might pay $250 (25% of $1,000). Under this new rule, you would only pay $150 (25% of $600). This change directly addresses the frustration of paying a percentage of a price that no one actually pays. Furthermore, the bill includes a specific protection for low-income subsidy recipients, ensuring their copayments for these chronic drugs can’t be higher than what the standard Part D plan requires.
While the intent is clearly beneficial, the implementation details raise a few flags. First, this new coinsurance rule doesn't apply if your plan uses a fixed copayment—as long as that copay isn't tied to the drug's price. This exemption means some plans could potentially maintain higher fixed copays that might exceed what the new net-price calculation would yield, depending on how they structure their benefits. Second, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement these complex changes using interim final regulations. This is policy-speak for fast-tracking the rules, which means bypassing the standard public notice and comment period. While speed might seem good, skipping public input can lead to less scrutiny and potential unintended consequences, especially when defining a critical term like “net price,” which relies on the PBMs’ internal accounting of discounts.
For the millions of Americans relying on Medicare Part D to manage long-term health issues, this bill represents a significant step toward making prescription drug costs more transparent and affordable. It forces plans to share the savings they negotiate with manufacturers directly with the consumer. However, the reliance on PBM-defined “net price” and the rush to implementation using interim regulations are areas that will need close monitoring to ensure the intended savings actually reach the seniors who need them most.