PolicyBrief
S. 2713
119th CongressSep 4th 2025
American Energy Security Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes a federal grant program to modernize and enhance the safety of community-owned natural gas distribution pipelines.

Jon Ossoff
D

Jon Ossoff

Senator

GA

LEGISLATION

New Energy Bill Authorizes $200M Annually for Public Gas Utilities to Fix Leaks and Modernize Pipelines

The American Energy Security Act of 2025 sets up a new grant program to tackle aging natural gas infrastructure across the country. Essentially, it authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to hand out $200 million every year, from Fiscal Year 2026 through 2029, to help community-owned (public) natural gas systems upgrade their pipelines. The main goal is simple: fix unintentional leaks, reduce accidents, and update systems so they can safely handle alternative fuels down the line (Sec. 2).

The Public Utility Upgrade Fund

This money is strictly for utilities owned by your city or community—private gas companies are explicitly excluded. If your local utility wants a piece of this $200 million annual pot, they can use it to repair, upgrade, or completely replace parts of their system, or buy new equipment. Think of it as a much-needed capital injection to replace those rusty, leaky pipes that have been in the ground since your grandparents were kids, making things safer for everyone on the block. The funding for this comes directly from general government revenues, meaning it’s paid for by general taxes, not by increasing user fees on gas bills (Sec. 2. Funding Details).

Who Gets the Money and Why

When the Department of Transportation decides who gets a grant, they have to look at a few key factors. They’ll prioritize systems that are high-risk, especially those with old, leaky pipes. But they also have to look at whether the project will create jobs, benefit economically disadvantaged rural or urban areas, and bring about positive economic growth. For example, a grant could go to a small city replacing its entire downtown gas network, creating local construction jobs while making the area safer and reducing the utility’s environmental footprint from methane leaks. The goal here is to blend safety improvements with economic benefits for communities that need them most (Sec. 2. How the Secretary Chooses Winners).

The Fine Print on Oversight

While this program is a win for public safety and modernization, there are a couple of details worth noting. The criteria for defining “positive economic growth” and identifying “disadvantaged areas” are broad, which gives the Secretary a lot of room to decide who gets the funds. Also, before the grant winners are announced, the Secretary must notify Congress, but they only have to do it three days before the final list is published. That short window doesn't give Congress much time for meaningful review, placing a lot of trust in the Department’s selection process. Any project receiving funds must also comply with existing civil rights (Title VI) and environmental review laws (NEPA), ensuring that modernization efforts don't bypass established protections (Sec. 2. Other Rules).