PolicyBrief
S. 270
119th CongressJan 28th 2025
Natural Disaster Resilience and Recovery Accountability Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes a commission to examine and recommend improvements to federal programs supporting natural disaster resilience and recovery, aiming to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and budget funding. The commission will submit a final report to Congress with policy recommendations within two years of its first meeting.

James Lankford
R

James Lankford

Senator

OK

LEGISLATION

Feds Create Disaster Response Commission: Your Tax Dollars and Disaster Relief Under Review

The "Natural Disaster Resilience and Recovery Accountability Act" sets up a 15-member commission to overhaul how the federal government handles disaster relief and preparedness. The goal? To make sure taxpayer money is being used effectively and that communities actually get the help they need when disaster strikes.

Disaster Relief Under the Microscope

This commission, operating under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), is tasked with scrutinizing every aspect of federal disaster programs. They'll be looking at everything from how money is allocated to how effectively different agencies work together. The commission has two years from its first meeting to deliver a final report to Congress, with interim reports every 180 days (SEC. 2(i)(2)). This means regular check-ins on their progress, keeping the process relatively transparent.

Who's on the Hook, and How?

The commission's members will be a mix of federal employees, state and local officials, and folks from the private sector and NGOs (SEC. 2(d)(1)(B)). The OMB Director gets to pick all 15 members, and the commission's funding comes out of the OMB's existing budget (SEC. 2(k))—meaning no new taxes to fund this effort, but it also might mean fewer resources for other OMB operations. Think of it like rearranging your budget to prioritize one thing over another; the money has to come from somewhere.

Real-World Impacts: From Floods to Wildfires

The definition of "natural disaster" is pretty broad, encompassing everything from hurricanes and earthquakes to extreme heat or cold (SEC. 2(b)). This means the commission's recommendations could impact a wide range of communities. For example, a farmer hit by repeated droughts might see changes in federal crop insurance programs, while a coastal town facing rising sea levels could see new guidelines for infrastructure funding.

Potential Roadblocks

While the aim is to improve disaster response, there are a few things to keep an eye on. All the members are appointed by the OMB director (Sec. 2(d)(1)), which could lead to questions of whether the commission is truly independent. The broad definition of what constitutes a natural disaster could also be a double-edged sword. It might allow for a more comprehensive approach, but it could also stretch resources thin or lead to debates about what qualifies as a "disaster." The commission's success will depend on how well it balances these factors and whether its recommendations lead to real, tangible improvements on the ground.