The "Federal Employee Return to Work Act" mandates that federal employees who telework at least one day a week will not receive annual pay adjustments or locality pay adjustments, ensuring their pay remains consistent with the "Rest of US" locality pay scale.
Bill Cassidy
Senator
LA
The Federal Employee Return to Work Act changes the pay and locality adjustments for federal employees who telework regularly. Covered employees will not receive annual pay adjustments and their pay will be based on the "Rest of US" locality pay scale, regardless of where they work. This change will take effect at the start of the fiscal year following the enactment of the Act.
The 'Federal Employee Return to Work Act' is shaking up the paychecks of federal employees who work remotely. Starting the next fiscal year after it's enacted, this law targets "covered employees" – basically, anyone teleworking at least one day a week, or 20% of their time on an alternative schedule. There are a few exceptions carved out, like folks with disability accommodations, Foreign Service members, federal law enforcement officers, active-duty military, and those whose official worksite isn't a typical office setting as defined by regulation 5 CFR 531.605(a)(1).
This bill hits teleworking feds in two ways. First, it freezes annual pay adjustments under 5 U.S.C. 5303. That means no yearly raises that typically keep pace with inflation and the cost of living. Second, it shifts these employees to the "Rest of US" locality pay scale (5 U.S.C. 5304). Locality pay adjusts salaries based on the cost of living in different areas – think San Francisco versus Des Moines. The "Rest of US" rate is generally lower than many specific localities, meaning a potential pay cut for feds in higher-cost areas.
Imagine a federal employee in Denver, CO, who teleworks two days a week. Under this law, they'd be switched to the "Rest of US" pay scale, which is likely lower than Denver's. They also wouldn't get their usual annual raise. For a mid-career professional, this could mean hundreds, maybe even thousands, of dollars less per year. That's groceries, rent, or childcare money – real impacts on family budgets.
While the bill's stated goal might be to encourage a return to in-office work, it raises some practical concerns. Defining "covered employee" could get messy, leading to potential disputes. What if someone's job requires occasional remote work? And what about the impact on employee morale and retention? Losing experienced staff could cost the government more in the long run through training and recruitment. The bill also presents potential conflicts of interest. While it might save taxpayer money on salaries, it could also pressure employees back into offices, even if telework is more efficient. It could also create inequities between those who work in the office and those who work remotely. It could also create challenges for those who need to work from home due to family constraints. The bill also potentially reduces the governments ability to be flexible during times of national emergency, such as a pandemic.
It's worth remembering that existing laws, like the Telework Enhancement Act of 2010, already govern federal telework. This new bill adds another layer, specifically targeting pay, which could create more confusion than clarity.