PolicyBrief
S. 2671
119th CongressAug 1st 2025
Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act mandates detailed annual reporting by the State Department on the status of reproductive rights, access to care, and related coercion globally, framing these issues as fundamental human rights.

Brian Schatz
D

Brian Schatz

Senator

HI

LEGISLATION

New Bill Mandates State Dept. Track Global Reproductive Rights, Coercion, and Disparities in Annual Reports

The new Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights Act of 2025 is a foreign policy bill that won't change your domestic healthcare access, but it significantly changes how the U.S. government talks about reproductive health on the global stage. Essentially, this bill forces the State Department to treat reproductive rights—including access to contraception, safe abortion, and freedom from coercion—as a core human rights issue in its official annual reports on every country it monitors.

The Global Audit: What the State Department Must Track

Think of the State Department’s annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices as the world’s report card on freedom and dignity. This bill, primarily found in Section 3, requires the State Department to drastically expand the reproductive health section of that report. They can no longer just give a vague overview; they have to dive deep into the specifics. For example, the State Department must now report on whether countries are expanding or restricting access to safe abortion and post-abortion care, and whether they are criminalizing pregnancy outcomes like miscarriages. This moves the needle from simple tracking to active scrutiny of national policies.

Tracking Coercion and Violence

One of the most critical additions is the mandate to report on reproductive coercion and violence. The bill requires reporting on specific instances of obstetric violence (mistreatment during childbirth), forced sterilization, forced abortions, and even forced pregnancies. This means if a foreign government is using incentives or punishments to control family size, the U.S. government has to document it. This kind of detailed reporting provides concrete data for human rights advocates and could make it harder for countries to ignore these abuses.

Data That Matters: Who Is Being Left Behind?

The bill also forces the State Department to analyze disparities in access to care. It requires reporting on differences in family planning access and pregnancy outcomes based on factors like race, ethnicity, disability, or sexual orientation (Section 3). For instance, if a country’s maternal mortality rate is significantly higher for women with disabilities or for a specific ethnic group, the State Department must document that disparity and report on what the local government is doing—or failing to do—to fix it. This is a huge win for advocates, as it ensures vulnerable groups aren’t overlooked in the broader human rights discussion.

The Consultation Requirement: Why It Matters

To ensure the reports are accurate and not just written from a distant embassy, the bill mandates that the Secretary of State consult with specific groups (Section 3). This includes U.S. and international civil society organizations focused on sexual and reproductive health, especially those working with women, girls, and LGBTQI persons. This requirement is a mechanism for accountability, ensuring the State Department hears directly from the people on the ground about the realities of access and abuse. While this dramatically increases the administrative burden on the State Department, it also ensures the reports are informed by real-world expertise, not just diplomatic talking points.