PolicyBrief
S. 2600
119th CongressJul 31st 2025
A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates a Defense Science Board study to determine the optimal organizational structure for the Department of Defense to handle digital engineering solutions like AI and software development.

Mike Rounds
R

Mike Rounds

Senator

SD

LEGISLATION

DoD Launches Study to Streamline AI and Software Teams: Report Due by 2027

This bill sets the wheels in motion for a major organizational review within the Department of Defense (DoD). Specifically, the Secretary of Defense must instruct the Defense Science Board (DSB) to conduct a deep dive into how the DoD—from the Secretary’s office down to the military branches—is currently set up to handle “digital solutions engineering.” Think AI systems, software applications, and data platforms. The main goal is to figure out the single most optimal organizational structure for developing, deploying, and maintaining this critical technology going forward.

The Digital Plumbing Problem

If you’ve ever worked for a big company, you know how quickly departments can multiply and start tripping over each other. The DoD is dealing with that on a massive scale, especially when it comes to software and AI. This study is basically an audit of the digital plumbing. The DSB has to look at every existing group doing digital work, figure out what they’re responsible for, how efficient they are, and where the current data systems are causing bottlenecks. It’s about checking where resources are going and if they’re getting the best bang for the buck.

Organizational Options on the Table

The DSB isn't just reviewing the status quo; they have to evaluate several potentially disruptive options. They must consider everything from creating an entirely new defense agency dedicated just to digital engineering—a massive undertaking—to simply optimizing the current structures. They also have to look at folding this work into an existing agency or putting all development functions directly under existing staff offices. For the DoD workforce, this means significant changes could be coming down the pike, affecting who they report to and how their teams are structured.

More Than Just Org Charts

This isn't just about moving boxes on a chart. The study must also tackle the practical realities of making a massive government organization agile. This includes recommending changes to governance—how they manage and secure things like AI models—and how they’ll coordinate with combatant commands. Crucially, the bill requires the DSB to look at special hiring and acquisition authorities. If you're a software engineer, this means the DoD is trying to figure out how to cut the red tape to hire and pay you competitively, and how to buy the tech they need faster than the current glacial pace. The study must also deliver a full transition plan: a roadmap, timeline, personnel changes needed, and cost estimates.

What This Means for the Real World

For the taxpayer, this effort is aimed at improving efficiency in a crucial area. The DoD spends billions on technology, and if this study leads to a more streamlined, effective structure for building software and AI, it could mean better tools for defense personnel and less wasted money. For the thousands of DoD employees and contractors currently working on these digital solutions, this study is the prelude to potential organizational upheaval. Their roles, reporting structures, and even their agencies could be on the chopping block in the name of 'optimization.' The final report, due by February 1, 2027, will lay out exactly who recommends what, setting the stage for major changes in how the DoD operates in the digital age.