The TORNADO Act mandates improvements to hazardous weather communication, develops a strategic plan for high-resolution forecasting, updates the tornado rating system, and enhances post-storm assessment procedures.
Roger Wicker
Senator
MS
The TORNADO Act aims to significantly improve the nation's ability to forecast, communicate, and respond to hazardous weather events. It establishes new offices and strategic plans to enhance the clarity and speed of public warnings, mandates a review of the tornado rating system, and refocuses key tornado research programs. Ultimately, the bill seeks to leverage better science and communication strategies to save lives and protect property from severe storms and other natural hazards.
If you’ve ever gotten a weather alert that left you scratching your head—like, ‘Is this a watch or a warning, and should I actually be doing something right now?’—this bill is for you. The TORNADO Act is essentially a massive upgrade to how the National Weather Service (NWS) forecasts, warns, and communicates about severe weather, from hurricanes and tornadoes to flash floods and ice storms.
The biggest change for everyday people is tucked away in Section 3, which focuses on Hazardous Weather and Water Event Risk Communication. The bill mandates that NOAA create a new office specifically tasked with cleaning up the messy language we currently use for weather alerts. Think of it as a massive simplification project. The goal isn’t just to make the warnings prettier; it’s to use the latest social science and behavioral research to make sure that when a warning hits your phone, you actually understand what action you need to take.
This means they have to look at the terms they use, ditch the confusing jargon, and figure out how to tailor warnings for different groups, including vulnerable populations. For a busy parent or someone working outside, this could mean the difference between ignoring a confusing push notification and immediately seeking shelter. They are even required to start a pilot program specifically for tornado warnings, partnering with colleges in high-poverty, storm-prone areas to test new communication methods.
Section 4, the Warn-on-Forecast Strategic Plan, is where the science gets serious. Within a year, the Under Secretary must deliver a roadmap for transitioning our entire warning system to high-resolution, probability-based forecasts. Instead of just hearing, “There might be a tornado,” the goal is to move toward alerts that say, “There is a 60% chance of a tornado in your specific neighborhood between 4:00 PM and 4:30 PM.”
This requires serious computing power and better observation tools, like improved radar and even drones. For anyone whose job or family safety depends on those critical few minutes of warning time—from construction workers to logistics managers—this shift from vague possibility to specific probability is a huge deal. It allows for smarter decisions, not just panic.
Ever wondered if the EF-scale used to rate tornadoes is still accurate? Section 5 requires the Under Secretary to review the current tornado rating system and, if they find it lacking, update it. This ensures that the ratings we use to assess the true severity of a storm are based on the best available science, which is important for everything from insurance claims to building codes.
Section 7 renames and refocuses the existing tornado research program as VORTEX-USA. This program is authorized to spend up to $11 million annually from 2025 through 2032, with at least $2 million earmarked for research grants. This money will fund studies not just on the physical science of how tornadoes form, but also on the social science of how people react to warnings. Importantly, the bill allows NOAA to prioritize these research grants for minority-serving institutions, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), helping to diversify the institutions driving this critical research.
Section 6 mandates that after any significant weather event, NOAA must conduct post-storm surveys and assessments. This is more than just measuring wind damage; it involves studying how communities reacted, whether risk predictions were accurate, and gathering data on who survived. The bill also specifically requires that the employees who do this difficult, often emotionally taxing work receive necessary training and access to mental and emotional health support, a small but important detail that acknowledges the human cost of these events.
Finally, Section 8 requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a deep dive into the NWS’s technology—hardware, software, and backup systems—to ensure the alert system is as fast and resilient as possible. This is the government equivalent of checking the wiring to make sure the lights don't go out when you need them most.