The CAP Act of 2025 eliminates the exemption for H-1B nonimmigrants employed by institutions of higher education from the annual numerical visa limitations.
Tom Cotton
Senator
AR
The CAP Act of 2025 eliminates the special exemption that allowed institutions of higher education to hire H-1B visa holders outside of the annual numerical cap. Under this new law, H-1B workers employed by colleges and universities will now be subject to the same annual numerical limits and lottery system as all other H-1B applicants. This change standardizes the process for foreign nationals seeking employment in higher education roles.
The CAP Act of 2025, or the Colleges for the American People Act, makes one big, immediate change: it pulls the plug on the special visa treatment higher education institutions currently enjoy. Specifically, Section 2 terminates the exemption that allowed colleges and universities to hire H-1B specialty occupation workers—think specialized professors, researchers, and highly technical staff—without counting them against the annual numerical cap. This means that if the CAP Act passes, universities will have to compete in the same H-1B lottery system as every other private sector company, from tech startups to manufacturing firms, for a limited number of visas.
Up until now, universities have had a huge advantage in recruiting top international talent. If a university wanted to hire a leading researcher in, say, advanced materials or a professor fluent in a critical, rare language, they could secure an H-1B visa for that person without worrying about the annual cap or the lottery. This was essentially a fast lane for academic institutions to fill highly specialized roles quickly. The CAP Act removes this exemption by modifying Section 214(g)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. For the average person, this change might seem distant, but it affects the quality of education and research coming out of U.S. schools. If a university can’t hire the best minds in a cutting-edge field, that research—and the potential economic benefits—might go elsewhere.
For universities, this change creates massive administrative headaches and uncertainty. Currently, they can plan their hiring knowing they can likely secure the necessary visas. Under the CAP Act, they will be subject to the same random lottery that often sees demand far outstripping supply. Imagine a university trying to hire a critical faculty member who specializes in a rare field, only to have their visa application fail in the lottery—they would either have to wait another year or lose that candidate entirely. This directly impacts the ability of U.S. institutions to maintain their competitive edge in global research, which often relies on international collaboration and specialized expertise.
While some might argue that this levels the playing field for other industries or encourages universities to hire more domestic workers, the immediate practical challenge is clear: universities are now competing for the same limited pool of visas as everyone else. This could slow down critical research projects, delay the introduction of specialized courses, and make it much harder for U.S. universities to attract and retain the international experts who often drive innovation. The bottom line is that the CAP Act makes it harder and slower for universities to secure the specialized talent they need to run high-level academic programs and research labs.