This Act enhances protections for FBI whistleblowers against retaliation and establishes new requirements for conflict-free investigations into their claims.
Charles "Chuck" Grassley
Senator
IA
The FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2025 significantly strengthens protections for FBI employees who report wrongdoing, explicitly prohibiting retaliation for protected disclosures. It mandates the Attorney General to actively prevent prohibited personnel actions and ensure staff are fully informed of their rights. Furthermore, the Act establishes clearer standards and conflict-of-interest safeguards for handling whistleblower retaliation claims.
The FBI Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2025 is essentially a major system upgrade for how the FBI handles internal complaints. It explicitly expands protections for FBI employees who report waste, fraud, or abuse, making it much harder for managers to retaliate against them. Specifically, it amends federal civil service law (Title 5, U.S. Code, Section 2303) to ensure that no personnel action—from hiring to firing—can be taken against an employee for reporting wrongdoing, cooperating with investigations, or testifying.
One of the biggest shifts here is accountability. The bill makes the Attorney General (AG) personally responsible for preventing these prohibited personnel practices within the FBI. This isn’t a suggestion; the AG must ensure the Bureau follows all relevant civil service rules. Furthermore, the AG needs to work with the Special Counsel and the Justice Department’s Inspector General to make sure every FBI employee—even those on probation—knows their rights and remedies. Think of it as mandatory training on not getting fired for doing the right thing. The FBI must also post these rights publicly and internally, including clear procedures for legally sharing classified information with oversight bodies.
This legislation addresses common tactics used to dismiss whistleblower claims. It clarifies that a disclosure is still protected even if you reported it to the person involved in the wrongdoing, the information was already known, or you made the report outside of work hours. This provision (SEC. 2) removes several technical escape routes that have historically allowed agencies to argue that a disclosure wasn't “official” enough to warrant protection. For employees, this means the shield of protection is significantly broader, covering nearly any good-faith effort to report misconduct.
If an FBI employee claims they were retaliated against, the investigation into that claim must now be squeaky clean. Section 3 mandates that within 180 days of the bill becoming law, the agencies responsible for investigating these complaints must develop clear policies to ensure the process is “completely free from any conflict of interest.” This is a critical change. It means the people investigating a retaliation claim can’t be buddies with, or report to, the managers accused of the retaliation. For FBI managers, this means any personnel action taken against an employee who has previously reported misconduct will face immediate, external scrutiny under a stricter, conflict-free standard. It raises the stakes significantly for supervisors when handling employee complaints.
While this bill focuses on internal FBI procedures, the real-world impact is about accountability. When people inside the FBI feel safe reporting potential malfeasance—whether it's misuse of funds, abuse of authority, or ethical breaches—the Bureau performs better, which ultimately serves the public interest. For those working within the FBI, this bill offers clearer legal recourse and a better chance of winning an appeal if they face wrongful termination or demotion. The law also updates the legal standards for proving retaliation claims to match those used in other federal agencies, providing a more consistent and robust legal framework for whistleblowers seeking justice.