PolicyBrief
S. 2515
119th CongressJul 29th 2025
Ban Corporate PACs Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act restricts the ability of corporations to establish separate segregated funds for political purposes, limiting this authority exclusively to nonprofit corporations and tightening solicitation rules to executive or administrative personnel.

Mark Kelly
D

Mark Kelly

Senator

AZ

LEGISLATION

Proposed Ban Corporate PACs Act Forces For-Profit PACs to Shut Down Within One Year

The aptly named “Ban Corporate PACs Act” is a piece of legislation aimed squarely at changing how political money flows, specifically targeting the political action committees (PACs) run by for-profit corporations. The core of this bill is simple: it amends the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) to state that only a “nonprofit corporation” (specifically, one exempt from taxes under Section 501(c) of the IRS Code) can establish or operate a separate segregated fund for political purposes (Section 2). If a corporation wants to keep its political fund, it has to be a bona fide nonprofit. If it tries to cheat the system by setting up one of these funds while claiming tax-exempt status, it automatically loses that tax-exempt status.

The Corporate Political Fund Shutdown

For the vast majority of corporations—the for-profit ones—this means the party is over. The bill effectively eliminates the ability of companies like major banks, manufacturers, and retailers to run their own corporate PACs. The bill is clear: any existing corporate political fund that doesn't meet the new nonprofit criteria must be completely shut down and all funds spent or disposed of within one year of the bill becoming law (Section 3). Think of it as a hard deadline for winding down a corporate political operation. This is a massive administrative change for hundreds of existing PACs, forcing them to liquidate their assets and close up shop in a very short timeframe.

Who Gets Asked for the Money Now?

Beyond just who can run a PAC, the bill also tightens the rules on who can be solicited for contributions. Currently, corporate PACs can often ask stockholders and their families for money. This bill removes that language entirely. Going forward, the only people these remaining nonprofit-run political funds can solicit are “executive or administrative personnel” (Section 2). This means that if you’re a shareholder but not part of the management team at a company, you’re off the solicitation list for these specific funds. This change drastically narrows the field of potential donors, focusing the funding base exclusively on a corporation’s top brass and management.

What This Means for Everyday Life

For most people, this bill won't change your commute or your grocery bill immediately, but it speaks to the broader conversation about who holds power in politics. If you’re someone who believes that corporate money distorts policy debates—whether it’s on environmental regulations, labor laws, or tax codes—this bill significantly restricts one of the primary avenues for that influence. It forces that political spending out of the corporate treasury and into vehicles with stricter rules. For the folks who previously ran or contributed to these corporate PACs, this means a major restructuring of their political engagement strategy, forcing them to find new ways to pool resources and influence policy outside of the corporate PAC structure, which has been a staple of political fundraising for decades.