The College Transparency Act establishes a secure, new Postsecondary Student Data System to track student outcomes, costs, and post-college success to increase transparency for consumers and researchers.
Bill Cassidy
Senator
LA
The College Transparency Act establishes a secure, new Postsecondary Student Data System to track student enrollment, completion, and post-college outcomes across higher education institutions. This system aims to increase transparency for students and families by providing clear data on costs and success rates, while minimizing duplicate reporting burdens for schools. The collected data will be used for secure research and public reporting of aggregate statistics, strictly prohibiting the sale of data or its use for federal college rankings.
The College Transparency Act is a big deal for anyone who has paid for, is paying for, or plans to pay for higher education. What it does, in short, is create a brand-new, secure, and comprehensive Postsecondary Student Data System (PSDS) managed by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). This isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a complete overhaul designed to give students, families, and policymakers a clear picture of what you actually get for your tuition dollars. The NCES Commissioner has four years to get this system operational, and once it’s running, it’s supposed to replace a bunch of the old, clunky reporting that colleges currently do, ideally cutting down on administrative headaches for schools.
Think of the PSDS as a system designed to answer the questions you ask at the kitchen table: Is this degree worth it? How much will I earn? The bill mandates tracking key metrics like retention, transfer rates, completion, and the actual cost of attendance, broken down by demographics like race, age, and whether you received a Pell Grant. The biggest change, though, is how it tracks your post-college life. The system requires secure, periodic data matches with federal agencies like the IRS/Treasury (to check student earnings), the Department of Defense/VA (to assess benefit usage), and the Social Security Administration. This means that for the first time, federal data will link your college enrollment directly to your earning potential years down the road, providing real-world return-on-investment figures for specific programs and institutions.
For students, the idea of the federal government linking your college records to your IRS tax data might raise an eyebrow. The bill is clearly aware of this, and it lays down some serious privacy mandates. First, it explicitly prohibits collecting truly sensitive data like individual health records, course grades, exact addresses, citizenship status, or political affiliation. Second, the system must follow strict federal security standards (NIST) and use data minimization techniques, meaning they only collect what is absolutely necessary. Crucially, the data collected cannot be used for any “adverse action” against a student—that means no debt collection, no law enforcement, and no immigration enforcement. If you’re a student, you get to review your data and request corrections, and the public only ever sees aggregated summary data, never your personal information.
If you’re a busy parent or a professional looking to go back to school, this bill aims to make comparison shopping much easier. The NCES will have to create a user-friendly website that publicly shares aggregated data on every institution. You’ll be able to compare schools based on things that actually matter: net price, employment rates, and typical earnings for graduates from specific programs. For example, instead of just seeing a national average, you could look up a specific four-year state university and see the median earnings five years after graduation for someone who majored in Electrical Engineering versus someone who majored in History. This level of granular, outcome-based data should significantly empower consumers.
On the one hand, this bill repeals an old law (Section 134 of the Higher Education Act) that previously prohibited the creation of such a comprehensive student data system, clearing the way for this massive federal project. The promise is that once the new system is up and running in four years, it will actually reduce the administrative burden on colleges by replacing the current, often redundant, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) surveys. On the other hand, creating this system requires every college receiving federal aid to start collecting and submitting detailed, student-level data, which is a massive undertaking. While the goal is to streamline, the transition period and the initial setup of this complex, multi-agency linked database will demand significant resources and compliance effort from every institution.