The SkyFoundry Act of 2025 establishes a rapid development and mass-production program, run by the Army, to quickly field one million small unmanned aircraft systems annually through dedicated innovation and production hubs utilizing streamlined acquisition methods.
Ted Cruz
Senator
TX
The SkyFoundry Act of 2025 establishes a new Department of Defense initiative, the SkyFoundry Program, tasked with rapidly developing, testing, and mass-producing small unmanned aircraft systems (drones). Run by the Army, the program will feature dedicated innovation and production hubs, utilizing special acquisition authorities to speed up fielding. The Act also directs efforts to boost domestic manufacturing capacity and allows for the modification of internal regulations to ensure rapid execution.
The SkyFoundry Act of 2025 is setting up a new, fast-track program within the Department of Defense (DoD) to rapidly develop and mass-produce small unmanned aircraft systems—drones, in plain English. This isn't just about buying new tech; it’s about building a massive, dedicated industrial pipeline, overseen by the Secretary of the Army, to crank out these systems quickly. The bill mandates the use of special, fast-lane purchasing methods, like "other transaction authority" and the "middle tier of acquisition pathway," which are designed to speed up fielding by skipping some of the traditional red tape.
This new program has two major components: an Innovation Hub and a Production Hub. The Innovation Hub will be a government-owned facility focused on research and development, essentially acting as a rapid design center. The real game-changer is the Production Hub, which must be capable of producing a staggering 1,000,000 small unmanned aircraft systems every single year. To make this happen, the President is directed to use powers under Title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950. This means the government will actively invest in and prioritize domestic manufacturing capacity, ensuring that the components and final drones are made in the U.S. This is a huge signal to the defense manufacturing sector that the government is serious about scaling up domestic production fast.
The bill requires the Secretary to prioritize using existing Army Depot sites for both the Innovation and Production Hubs, picking at least two separate locations. However, the requirements for the massive Production Hub are highly specific: the chosen Army Depot must cover 15,000 total acres, have 10,000 buildable acres, include 8,000,000 square feet of existing facilities, and be located within 50 miles of four different states. These tight physical constraints could severely limit the selection pool, potentially favoring one or two specific sites regardless of whether they are the most operationally efficient choice. Furthermore, the Secretary is authorized to bypass normal construction rules (Chapter 169 of Title 10) to renovate or build these facilities, which could mean faster construction but less transparency in the process.
To keep the whole operation running at warp speed, the bill grants the Secretary of Defense or the Army the power to waive or modify any Department of Defense rules or internal procedures that might slow down the rapid development, buying, or production activities of the SkyFoundry Program. While the goal is necessary—getting critical tech into the field quickly—this broad authority raises serious questions about oversight. When standard checks and balances are sidelined, even for a good reason, it increases the risk of wasted spending or reduced accountability. This also impacts government oversight bodies whose job it is to enforce those rules.
To ensure the military gets the best tech immediately, the bill allows the Secretary to sign multiyear contracts with private companies, enabling specialized civilian staff to work directly inside these government facilities alongside military and civilian teams. This kind of public-private partnership can accelerate innovation, but it also means that private contractors are deeply embedded in the government's development process. To protect taxpayer investment, the bill mandates that the U.S. government must retain the intellectual property rights—specifically, "Government purpose rights"—for anything jointly developed. This ensures the military can maintain, update, and competitively purchase those systems later on, preventing a single contractor from holding a monopoly on essential defense technology.