This bill establishes the National Biochar Research Network to study and promote the effective, safe, and profitable use of biochar for improving soil health, boosting agriculture, and mitigating climate change.
Charles "Chuck" Grassley
Senator
IA
The Biochar Research Network Act of 2025 establishes a national network to rigorously research the use of biochar for improving soil health, enhancing crop resilience, and sequestering carbon. This network will test biochar production methods and applications across various climates and soil types to develop science-based recommendations. The goal is to provide practical guidance to farmers and land managers while informing federal conservation standards. Congress authorized $50 million annually through 2030 to fund this research.
If you’ve ever wondered how we can farm better while also fighting climate change, this bill is about to fund the answer. The Biochar Research Network Act of 2025 establishes a new National Biochar Research Network, authorizing $50 million every year from 2025 through 2030 to study biochar—a fancy term for charcoal made from organic waste materials. The goal is simple: figure out the best, safest, and most profitable ways for farmers and land managers to use this material to improve soil health, increase crop yields, and lock carbon away permanently.
This isn’t just some abstract science project. The bill mandates the creation of up to 20 research sites across the country, managed by the Agricultural Research Service, to test biochar on different soils and climates. Why should you care? Because if this research pays off, it directly affects the cost and quality of your food. The network has to figure out how biochar helps soil hold water during droughts and how it makes farms more profitable, which could stabilize food prices and keep local farms resilient when the weather gets rough. For the person paying the grocery bill, more resilient farms mean less volatile prices.
Specifically, the network must run experiments to see how different biochars affect crop growth, greenhouse gas emissions, and long-term carbon storage. They’re also required to look at the entire lifecycle, making sure they analyze both the economic outcomes for farmers and the environmental impact of production. This isn't just about making dirt better; it’s about making the farming business model better and more sustainable, especially for those dealing with rising input costs and unpredictable weather.
One of the most important provisions in this Act is the mandate to deliver practical, region-specific advice. The researchers aren't allowed to keep their findings locked up in a university journal. They have to share what they learn with farmers, foresters, and land managers, explaining the most advantageous ways to use biochar to increase profits and improve health while cutting emissions. Think of it as a government-funded R&D department for the American farmer, providing data-backed blueprints for using this tool effectively.
This research will also directly influence government conservation programs. The bill gives the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to update or create new conservation practice standards based on the network’s findings. This means that if biochar proves to be a game-changer for soil health and climate adaptation, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will be required to integrate that knowledge into their technical and financial support programs. For a local farmer looking to invest in better soil management, this could mean access to new, science-backed federal assistance to offset the costs of adoption.
While the potential benefits are significant, the bill also includes a crucial safety check: the network must develop testing methods to ensure biochar doesn't contain contaminants that could harm the land. Since biochar is made from various organic materials (feedstocks), quality control is essential before it’s spread across millions of acres. This provision is key for ensuring that the push for sustainability doesn't inadvertently introduce new problems.
Given the complexity, the bill involves coordination across several agencies—USDA (including the Forest Service and ARS), the Department of Energy, and the Department of the Interior. Coordinating up to 20 research sites across multiple federal agencies is a massive undertaking. The $50 million annual authorization is a serious commitment, but the success of the network will depend entirely on how efficiently these agencies can work together to turn complex scientific data into clear, actionable advice that helps the people who actually work the land.