The Art Market Integrity Act expands federal anti-money laundering requirements by mandating that certain art market participants report high-value transactions of works of art.
John Fetterman
Senator
PA
The Art Market Integrity Act updates federal law to require certain participants in the art market to report large monetary transactions. This applies to dealers, advisors, and intermediaries involved in art sales exceeding specified monetary thresholds. The Treasury Department is tasked with developing the necessary regulations to implement these new anti-money laundering reporting requirements.
The new Art Market Integrity Act is looking to shine a bright light on the high-end art world by bringing certain participants under the umbrella of federal financial reporting rules. Starting soon, art dealers, galleries, auction houses, consultants, and even collectors who act as intermediaries will have to start keeping records and potentially reporting transactions involving "works of art" if they hit specific dollar thresholds.
This bill essentially expands Title 31 of the U.S. Code—the part of the law that deals with anti-money laundering (AML) and financial tracking—to include the art market. Previously, these rules mostly targeted banks and large financial institutions. Now, if you are an art market participant, you face new obligations if you meet one of two annual thresholds: you participated in a single art transaction valued over $10,000, or your total art transactions added up to $50,000 or more in the previous year. This is a big deal for galleries and advisors, who now have the compliance burden of tracking and potentially reporting these sales, similar to how banks track large cash deposits.
For the average person, this bill won't change how they buy a print from a local artist. The bill clearly defines "work of art" as original paintings, sculptures, drawings, and certain types of video or installation art, specifically excluding things like architectural plans, fashion design, or mass-produced decorative items. Crucially, the law gives a pass to the creators themselves: if an artist is only selling art they personally created, they are exempt from these new reporting requirements. This means the bill targets the dealers and intermediaries, not the working artist trying to sell their own creations at a market.
While the goal is to stop illicit funds from flowing through the high-value art market—a legitimate concern for federal law enforcement—the immediate impact falls on art businesses. Small-to-mid-sized galleries, art advisors, and consultants now face new administrative costs. They will have to implement systems, train staff, and dedicate resources to tracking transactions and ensuring they comply with AML rules, which can be complex. If you're running a gallery that handles a few sales over $10,000 a year, you're now essentially acting as a financial gatekeeper, required to track client information and transaction details.
Don't expect these rules to kick in tomorrow. The bill gives the Treasury Secretary 180 days to propose the actual rules and regulations. This rulemaking process is where the details will be hashed out, including how strictly agents and intermediaries must comply and whether the location of the transaction (domestic versus international) matters. The reporting requirements won't actually take effect until those rules are finalized, or 360 days after the law passes, whichever comes first. This waiting period is critical because the Treasury Department will essentially decide how heavy the compliance burden will be on the industry. The Secretary also has to update existing guidance from the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) regarding transactions involving sanctioned individuals, which aims to ensure that high-value art isn't being used by bad actors to skirt sanctions.