This Act establishes federal grants to strengthen coordination between various service providers to improve comprehensive support for survivors of sexual assault.
Lisa Murkowski
Senator
AK
The Healing Partnerships for Survivors Act establishes new federal grants to strengthen coordination between health, behavioral health, disability, and sexual assault service providers. These funds aim to create trauma-informed, culturally relevant support systems for survivors of sexual assault, including adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Grantees will use the funding to develop integrated services such as direct support, case management, and specialized healing approaches. The bill authorizes $30 million annually for these grants from fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
The “Healing Partnerships for Survivors Act” is setting up a new federal grant program that looks pretty straightforward: it wants to make sure sexual assault survivors don’t have to navigate the healthcare system alone. Essentially, this bill creates a dedicated funding stream to help organizations stop working in silos and start working together, specifically when it comes to supporting survivors.
This new program, authorized for $30 million annually between 2026 and 2030, will be managed by the Office of Family Violence Prevention and Services. The goal is to fund partnerships between local sexual assault programs (like your community rape crisis center), healthcare providers, mental health services, and disability programs. Think of it as building a better, more connected support network so a survivor seeking counseling doesn't have to explain their trauma four different times to four different agencies.
If you’re a survivor, the impact here is access to more holistic care. The grants are designed to fund “trauma-informed” and “culturally relevant” services. This means the money must be used for things like direct services—therapy, support groups, temporary housing help, and case management advocacy. Crucially, the bill also specifically targets support for adult survivors who experienced abuse as children, making sure they get help when seeking health or substance-use treatment later in life. For the busy person, this means a better chance that the services they need—from a doctor’s visit to recovery support—are integrated and respectful of their history, reducing the emotional labor of seeking help.
To get this money, the applicants must be established groups like state or tribal sexual assault coalitions, or nonprofit community-based programs that already have a track record of helping survivors. This ensures the funds go to organizations already doing the heavy lifting on the ground.
While this is a clear win for coordination, there are a few practical details worth noting. The bill reserves up to 10% of the total grant money for technical assistance and training. This funding will go to a few selected organizations to help train the grantees on how to run these new partnership programs effectively. The catch is that the organizations selected for this training role must demonstrate experience providing assistance “nationwide.” This requirement might inadvertently favor large, established national groups over smaller, highly specialized community organizations, even if those smaller groups are the best experts in serving specific cultural communities.
Furthermore, the bill uses terms like “trauma-informed” and “culturally relevant” quite a bit. While the intent is excellent, since the bill doesn’t lay out specific federal standards for what those terms mean, there’s a medium risk of inconsistent application among the various grantees. For the average person, this means the quality of the coordinated care might vary depending on which state or community organization receives the funding.
Overall, the “Healing Partnerships for Survivors Act” aims to fix a common problem in public services: fragmentation. By dedicating $30 million annually to force better collaboration between health systems and survivor advocates, the legislation offers a significant boost to the quality and accessibility of care for a vulnerable population, making the path to recovery less bureaucratic and more supportive.