This act reauthorizes and updates the Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership program to enhance wildfire recovery, improve resource management, and strengthen collaboration between the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service through 2029.
Michael Bennet
Senator
CO
The Joint Chiefs Reauthorization Act of 2025 updates the existing Landscape Restoration Partnership program to enhance collaboration between the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service. This bill expands the program's focus to explicitly include wildfire recovery and natural resource improvement. It also aligns priority areas with state forest action plans and extends the program's operational timeline through 2029.
The Joint Chiefs Reauthorization Act of 2025 is essentially a tune-up and extension for a major federal program designed to fix up our national landscapes. This bill focuses on the Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership program, originally set up under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and gives it a longer runway and a clearer mission. Crucially, it extends the program’s operational timeline, pushing its expiration date from the previous 2023 references all the way through 2029.
If you live anywhere near the wildland-urban interface, you know that the immediate danger of a wildfire is just the beginning. This bill recognizes that reality by expanding the program’s focus. Previously, the partnership focused on general land restoration; now, it specifically includes recovering from wildfires and improving the health of soil, water, and other natural resources. This means federal dollars will be explicitly channeled not just into preventing fires, but into the long, expensive process of bringing scorched land back to life. For communities dealing with the aftermath—like dangerous mudslides caused by lack of vegetation—this focused investment could be a game-changer.
One of the biggest practical changes here is the mandate for federal agencies to actually talk to each other. The Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), which manages the program, must now work closely with the Forest Service. This isn't a suggestion; it’s a requirement to review the Forest Service’s existing management plans and collaborate on forestry practices. The goal is to make sure restoration efforts aren't happening in a vacuum, but are instead aligned with what the land managers already know and are doing. They must use the “best science available,” which sounds great, but keep in mind that the interpretation of what constitutes the “best” science can sometimes be flexible, which is something to watch as this rolls out.
When federal agencies decide where to spend restoration money, they can’t just pick spots on a map. This bill requires that any priority areas selected for restoration work must align with the state’s existing forest action plan or a similar state-level priority plan. This is a big win for state-level planning, ensuring that federal efforts support local and regional conservation strategies rather than overriding them. Furthermore, the program’s updated focus areas must now consider the impacts that happen after a wildfire, like erosion and habitat loss, not just the pre-fire risk.
Finally, the bill includes a crucial clarification regarding existing environmental protections. It explicitly states that the program’s rules cannot conflict with existing Forest Service regulations concerning “Special Areas,” specifically those related to Roadless Area Conservation (36 CFR parts 294, subparts C and D). For those who care about preserving designated wilderness and remote areas, this provision ensures that the push for restoration and collaboration doesn't accidentally undermine established protections for these sensitive federal lands.