PolicyBrief
S. 2260
119th CongressJul 10th 2025
Border Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes federal programs and funding to restore water quality and public health in the Tijuana and New River watersheds and provides infrastructure assistance for U.S.-Mexico border communities.

Alejandro "Alex" Padilla
D

Alejandro "Alex" Padilla

Senator

CA

LEGISLATION

Border Water Act Commits $100M Annually for Tijuana and New River Cleanup, Targeting Chronic Sewage Crisis

The newly proposed Border Water Quality Restoration and Protection Act is essentially a massive, multi-year infrastructure plan aimed squarely at two of the most chronically polluted waterways in the U.S.: the Tijuana River and the New River. This bill sets up dedicated, federally-funded programs to tackle the decades-long crisis of raw sewage, industrial waste, and stormwater runoff flowing across the border from Mexico, which has led to constant beach closures and serious health risks in communities like Imperial Beach, California.

The Cleanup Crew: Two Separate $50M Programs

Think of this bill as setting up two parallel, heavily funded operations run by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Title I establishes the Tijuana River Public Health and Water Quality Restoration Program, and Title II does the same for the New River. For each river, the bill authorizes $50 million annually from 2026 through 2036—that’s a potential $100 million a year dedicated just to cleaning up these two waterways. This money is earmarked for grants, technical assistance, and construction projects (SEC. 105, SEC. 205).

This isn't just about throwing money at the problem; it’s about making a plan. For both rivers, the EPA Administrator must create a detailed Water Quality Action Plan within one year, which must be updated every five years (SEC. 104, SEC. 204). This plan requires a priority list of projects—like wastewater treatment upgrades, green infrastructure, and trash removal—that are backed by science and show measurable results. For coastal residents, this means the plan must prioritize projects that stop transboundary flows from shutting down beaches and fouling the environment.

The Fine Print: Who Pays for the Long Haul?

One of the smartest parts of this legislation is its focus on the often-forgotten operational costs. Most infrastructure bills focus on building the thing; this one demands a plan for keeping it running. The EPA Administrator must figure out how to finance the ongoing operation and maintenance of all this new and existing infrastructure (SEC. 104, SEC. 204). This is critical because past projects have often failed due to lack of sustained funding for maintenance, leading to pump failures and renewed pollution flow. This bill aims to stop that cycle.

For taxpayers, this means a significant commitment of federal dollars—$100 million annually, plus funding for the broader border infrastructure program in Title III. However, the bill also allows the EPA to require grant recipients (state, local, or private entities) to cost-share on a case-by-case basis (SEC. 105, SEC. 205). If you’re a local water district, this means you might be required to chip in to get that federal money, linking local responsibility to federal funding.

Bigger Picture: Border Infrastructure and Coordination

Beyond the two river cleanups, Title III creates the United States-Mexico Border Water Infrastructure Program. This is a broader pot of money for water, wastewater, and stormwater projects within 62 miles of the border. This program is designed to fund projects that fix existing health or environmental problems and, crucially, must have an "impact inside the United States" (SEC. 301). This provision is key, as it prevents funding projects that only benefit areas south of the border without addressing U.S. concerns.

To make any of this work, the EPA has to coordinate with practically every relevant federal agency—from the Department of Homeland Security (Border Patrol agents are often exposed to the pollution) to the Department of Defense. Title IV clarifies that the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) will be the agency responsible for actually building and running these water quality projects in the U.S., using the funds authorized by the EPA. This setup tries to streamline the process by having the EPA plan and fund, while the IBWC executes and maintains the physical infrastructure.

In short, this bill is a long-overdue, comprehensive attempt to solve a massive cross-border environmental problem. It provides the structure and the authorized funding to move past temporary fixes and create a sustained solution, provided the massive coordination required between dozens of agencies and a foreign government actually works.