PolicyBrief
S. 2218
119th CongressJul 9th 2025
Combat Action Recognition and Evaluation (CARE) for Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Crews Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes an official combat status identifier equivalent for Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) crews to recognize their service in combat operations.

Jacky Rosen
D

Jacky Rosen

Senator

NV

LEGISLATION

New Act Mandates Equal Combat Status Recognition for Drone Crews Within 180 Days

This new piece of legislation, the Combat Action Recognition and Evaluation (CARE) for Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Crews Act of 2025, is straightforward: It demands that the military finally formalize the combat status of drone crews. Specifically, it gives the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps 180 days to establish a special status identifier for RPA crew members who are conducting combat operations. This new designation must carry the exact same weight and recognition—or “equivalent merit”—as the combat status identifier currently given to pilots flying manned aircraft in combat zones (SEC. 2).

Finally Acknowledging the Remote Fight

For years, there’s been a disconnect between the high-stakes, life-or-death decisions made by drone operators and the official recognition they receive compared to pilots in cockpits. While the physical risk is different, the mental and operational strain of directing lethal force from thousands of miles away is very real. This bill aims to close that gap. The core benefit is simple: formal validation. For an RPA crew member, this means their service in combat is officially recognized on par with traditional combat aviators, which can be critical for morale, career progression, and potentially qualifying for certain combat-related benefits or entitlements (SEC. 2).

What “Equivalent Merit” Really Means

The biggest question mark in this bill is the phrase “equivalent merit.” The military departments are tasked with creating a status that is just as good as the existing combat identifier, but the bill doesn't define what that looks like in practice. This vagueness, while minor, leaves the door open for interpretation. For the actual RPA crew member, the worry is that the services might create a symbolic badge that looks good but doesn't actually translate into equal standing when it comes to things like promotion boards, priority access to certain programs, or even specific veteran benefits tied to combat status. The intent is clearly to level the playing field, but the implementation will determine if it’s truly equal or just an asterisk next to the manned-aircraft designation.

The Real-World Impact on Service

Think about a Staff Sergeant who operates a Reaper drone, spending 12 hours a day targeting enemy positions. Under the current system, their combat service might not be formally recognized in the same way as a fighter pilot returning from a mission. The CARE Act changes this. By mandating a formal, equivalent status, it ensures that this Staff Sergeant’s combat experience is fully credited. This isn't just about a patch on a uniform; it’s about making sure the people who are actually engaging in combat operations—even if they are doing it from a trailer in Nevada—get the official recognition and support they deserve, ensuring fairness across the board for modern warfare personnel.