This Act mandates that the VA must ensure access to a full-service VA hospital or comparable contracted services within each of the 48 contiguous states for eligible veterans.
Jeanne Shaheen
Senator
NH
The Veterans Full-Service Care and Access Act of 2025 mandates that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) must ensure at least one full-service VA hospital is located within the borders of each of the 48 contiguous states. If a physical hospital is not feasible, the VA must provide comparable services through contracts with other local health care providers. The Secretary must report to Congress within one year on compliance with these new access requirements.
The Veterans Full-Service Care and Access Act of 2025 is a straightforward piece of legislation with a massive goal: guaranteeing physical access to comprehensive VA hospital care for veterans across the country. Essentially, this bill mandates that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) must ensure that every one of the 48 contiguous states has at least one full-service VA hospital located within its borders where eligible veterans can receive treatment. If a full-service hospital isn't already there, the VA must contract with local providers to offer comparable services, effectively closing geographical gaps in high-level VA care. This is a big deal for veterans who currently have to travel across state lines just to access the services they earned.
For veterans living in states currently lacking a comprehensive VA medical center—and trust me, they exist—this bill could dramatically change their access to healthcare. Think of a veteran in a state like Wyoming or Delaware who needs specialized surgery or inpatient psychiatric care; under the current system, they might have to drive hundreds of miles into a neighboring state, turning a routine appointment into a multi-day ordeal. Section 2 of this Act aims to eliminate that barrier by making sure the full suite of hospital services is available locally, either through a dedicated VA facility or a robust contract with a private hospital. Crucially, the bill doesn’t stop the VA from sending a veteran to a neighboring state for more specialized care if that’s the best option, but it sets a baseline for essential services right at home.
While the mandate to provide full-service care in every state is a clear win for veterans' convenience and health, implementation won't be cheap or easy. The bill doesn't actually define what a “full-service VA hospital” is, leaving that interpretation up to the VA Secretary. This is where the rubber meets the road: does “full-service” mean a major medical center with an emergency room, multiple surgical suites, and specialized clinics, or could the VA designate a smaller, less comprehensive facility to meet the letter of the law? If the VA determines that they need to build new facilities in states that don't currently have them, that's a massive infrastructure and financial commitment, which could strain the VA’s budget and administrative resources. For taxpayers, this means potentially significant new construction costs. For local communities, this could mean new jobs and economic activity, but also local zoning or resource debates if the VA decides to build a major new center.
This legislation also includes a small technical update to the existing Veterans Community Care Program rules, mainly just adding a date reference. More importantly for accountability, the Act requires the VA Secretary to report back to Congress within one year on how they are complying with this new requirement. This report will be the first chance to see how the VA is defining “full-service” and what concrete steps they are taking—whether building new hospitals or signing major contracts—to meet the mandate. For veterans, this report will be key to understanding whether they are getting genuinely comprehensive care locally or just a minimal setup to check the box.