This bill repeals the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019.
Jeanne Shaheen
Senator
NH
This bill proposes the complete repeal of the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019. By enacting this legislation, all existing rules and requirements established under that 2019 act will be eliminated.
This bill is short, direct, and has massive real-world implications: it completely repeals the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019. That’s it. No phase-outs, no adjustments—just a full stop on the entire legal framework that put sanctions on the Syrian regime and its financial backers. If this passes, every rule, requirement, and sanction established by the 2019 Act is immediately wiped off the books. This isn't about tweaking foreign policy; it’s about pulling the plug entirely on a major accountability tool.
Think of the Caesar Act as a financial pressure cooker intended to protect civilians. Passed in 2019, it was designed to impose sanctions on anyone—including foreign governments, businesses, and individuals—who financially supported the Syrian regime's human rights abuses against its own people. The goal was to cut off the money supply to those responsible for atrocities, making it harder for them to operate and potentially easing the humanitarian crisis. For example, if a construction company was helping rebuild infrastructure controlled by sanctioned entities, the Caesar Act allowed penalties against that company, even if it was based outside of Syria. The Act aimed to ensure that economic engagement with Syria didn't inadvertently fund war crimes.
Repealing this law means that the financial guardrails intended to protect Syrian civilians are gone. The primary beneficiaries of this move are the Syrian government and the businesses and individuals who have been subject to these sanctions. For them, the repeal is a green light to resume or expand trade and financial activities without the threat of U.S. penalties. This could include foreign energy companies looking to invest in Syrian oil or construction firms eager to participate in rebuilding efforts previously deemed off-limits due to the regime’s involvement.
On the flip side, the immediate losers are the Syrian civilians the original act was designed to protect. The Caesar Act was one of the few legal mechanisms aimed at holding powerful actors accountable by hitting them where it hurts—their wallets. Removing it essentially eliminates a major point of leverage intended to deter further human rights abuses. For advocacy groups and those seeking accountability, this repeal removes a critical tool for pressuring the regime, raising concerns that the door is now open for increased financial support for the very entities responsible for the conflict and civilian suffering. This bill is clear: it prioritizes the complete removal of economic restrictions, which may ease certain commercial transactions but at the cost of eliminating accountability measures for a humanitarian crisis.