This Act modernizes tax-exempt bond financing by expanding eligible manufacturing facilities, significantly increasing bond limits, and raising financing caps for first-time farmers, with future adjustments indexed to inflation.
Joni Ernst
Senator
IA
The Modernizing Agricultural and Manufacturing Bonds Act significantly increases the dollar limits for tax-exempt bonds used for manufacturing projects, expanding the definition of eligible facilities to include certain intangible property creation. Additionally, the bill raises the financing cap for first-time farmers accessing private activity bonds from $\$450,000$ to $\$1,000,000$. Both sets of increased limits will be automatically adjusted for inflation starting in future years.
The “Modernizing Agricultural and Manufacturing Bonds Act” is essentially a major overhaul of how manufacturers and first-time farmers can access tax-exempt financing. This bill significantly increases the dollar limits on qualified small issue bonds—a type of tax-exempt bond that helps private businesses finance capital projects—and broadens who can use them. These changes affect two very different sectors, but the core impact is the same: making it easier and cheaper for certain businesses to borrow money, which ultimately shifts some of the financing cost onto federal taxpayers.
The biggest change for manufacturers is the massive increase in financing capacity. The limit for a single manufacturing project financed through these bonds is jumping from $10 million to a hefty $30 million. Even more significantly, the total amount of tax-exempt financing a single taxpayer can receive is ballooning from $40 million to $120 million (SEC. 2). Think of a mid-sized manufacturer looking to build a new plant or overhaul an old one; they just got three times the leverage from tax-exempt financing, meaning lower interest costs for them. The bill also smartly adds an inflation adjustment starting in 2026, so these limits won't become irrelevant a decade from now.
Critically, the bill expands the definition of a “manufacturing facility” to include facilities that create certain types of intangible property, not just physical goods. This is a nod to modern industry, covering things like software development or specialized intellectual property creation (SEC. 2). However, this section also allows up to 25% of the bond proceeds to go toward “functionally related and subordinate” facilities on the same site. While that sounds technical, it means a quarter of the tax-subsidized money could fund things like administrative offices or support buildings, potentially stretching the definition of what should qualify for taxpayer-backed financing.
For first-time farmers, this bill is a game-changer for getting started. Currently, a new farmer can only finance up to $450,000 using tax-exempt private activity bonds. This bill nearly doubles that cap to a full $1 million (SEC. 3). For anyone trying to buy land, equipment, or livestock, that extra capital can make the difference between a dream and a viable business plan. The bill also simplifies things by removing the separate, lower dollar limit that used to apply specifically to financing used farm equipment, rolling it all under the new $1 million cap.
However, there’s one subtle but important change in how eligibility is determined. To qualify as a first-time farmer, the size of your farm must be compared to other farms in the area. The bill changes the standard from the median farm size to the average farm size (SEC. 3). If you live in an area with a few massive corporate farms, the average size might be much larger than the median, meaning a new farmer could potentially buy a much larger farm and still qualify for this subsidized financing. While intended to help new entrants, this shift could inadvertently allow larger operations to qualify for benefits meant for genuinely smaller, start-up farms.
These changes are a huge win for manufacturers and new farmers by lowering their borrowing costs. But remember, tax-exempt bonds mean that the interest earned by the bondholders isn't taxed by the federal government. When the government gives up that tax revenue, it’s essentially subsidizing the project. By dramatically increasing the limits and expanding eligibility, this bill increases the volume of subsidized debt, which translates into a cost carried by all federal taxpayers through a reduced tax base. So, while your local factory or new farm might get a financial boost, the bill represents a quiet shift of financial burden onto the broader public.