This Act establishes the permanent Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board to ensure federal agencies effectively translate wildfire research into practical, actionable strategies.
Ruben Gallego
Senator
AZ
The Wildfire Coordination Act establishes a permanent Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board to bridge the gap between wildfire research and practical application by federal agencies. This diverse board, composed of federal leaders and external experts, will prioritize research implementation and disseminate best practices to improve wildfire management. The Act authorizes $10 million to fund the Board's operations over time.
The newly proposed Wildfire Coordination Act isn't about hiring more firefighters or buying new trucks—it’s about making sure the people fighting fires are using the best possible information. This bill establishes the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board, a permanent body under the Secretary of the Interior, tasked with translating cutting-edge research into practical, real-world actions for federal agencies. The Board is authorized to receive $10,000,000 in dedicated, non-expiring funding to get this massive coordination effort off the ground.
Think of this Board as the central hub for making sure that wildfire science doesn't just sit on a shelf. For years, there’s been a gap: researchers figure out better ways to predict fire behavior or build fire-resistant communities, but that information struggles to make it into the hands of the Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management crews on the ground. This Board’s main job is to close that gap. Specifically, it must prioritize which research is most important to put into action first and then set up the mechanisms—like online portals, webinars, and workshops—to share those best practices with everyone from federal agencies to local fire departments (SEC. 2).
This isn't just an internal federal affair. The Board is designed to be a massive collaboration, pulling in heavy hitters from nearly every federal agency involved in land management, weather, and health—think the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, plus the heads of FEMA, NOAA, and the CDC. Crucially, the bill mandates the inclusion of up to 18 non-federal experts, including representatives from state, local, and Tribal governments, local fire departments, private sector groups focused on building codes, and specialists in public health and predictive modeling (SEC. 2). This means that a Tribal leader who manages prescribed burns, or a local fire chief who knows exactly what kind of communication fails in a crisis, will have a seat at the table to guide federal research priorities.
For the average person, this bill aims to make wildfire response smarter, not just bigger. If you live in a fire-prone area, better coordination between scientists and managers could mean that the vegetation clearing done near your community is based on the latest fire modeling, not just decades-old practice. For an architect or builder, the Board's work could speed up the adoption of new, fire-resistant building codes based on research from places like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which is also represented on the Board. The goal is to move beyond simply fighting fires and toward informed, proactive risk reduction.
While the concept of better coordination is solid, there are practical challenges. The Board is given broad authority to decide which research is the “most important” to implement. This is a lot of power over priorities, and without clearly defined metrics, it could become a political battleground over which projects get the green light. Also, while the Board has dedicated funding, the federal members are allowed to use “existing, uncommitted funds” from their own agencies to help with the Board’s work. While this flexibility is good, it raises the possibility that resources might be quietly diverted from other established agency priorities to support this new coordination effort. The Board is required to report back to Congress within two years, detailing their progress and flagging any roadblocks, which should provide the first major check on how effectively this new structure is operating.