This act mandates the deportation and immediate visa cancellation for non-citizens convicted of specific violent or destructive crimes committed during protests.
Tom Cotton
Senator
AR
The No Visas for Violent Criminals Act establishes new grounds for the deportation of non-citizens convicted of certain crimes committed during protests, specifically those involving property destruction or blocking critical infrastructure. Conviction under these provisions results in the immediate cancellation of any existing visa. Furthermore, the bill mandates the swift removal of the individual from the United States within 60 days of the conviction.
This bill, officially titled the “No Visas for Violent Criminals Act,” makes a major change to immigration law by creating new grounds for deporting non-citizens based on specific protest-related convictions. Essentially, if a non-citizen is convicted of a crime committed during a protest—specifically defacing or destroying federal property, or intentionally blocking a highway, road, bridge, or tunnel—they become immediately deportable. This adds a new category to the list of offenses that can get someone removed from the country (Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
For anyone holding a visa or even a green card, this legislation significantly raises the stakes of participating in public demonstrations. The bill targets actions often classified as civil disobedience, such as sitting down to block traffic or using spray paint on a government building. What might be a misdemeanor or a minor fine for a citizen suddenly becomes an express ticket to deportation for a non-citizen. If convicted of one of these protest-related crimes, the bill mandates two immediate consequences: first, the person’s existing visa is canceled immediately, and second, the government must remove that person from the United States within 60 days of the conviction date.
Think about this in practical terms. Say an engineer working on an H-1B visa, or a permanent resident (green card holder) who has lived here for twenty years, participates in a protest against local environmental policy. If they get swept up and convicted of blocking a road—a crime aimed at disruption rather than violence—their life here is over. The 60-day removal clock starts ticking right away. This is a crucial detail because standard deportation cases can take months or years, allowing time for appeals, legal strategy, and presenting hardship cases. By mandating immediate visa cancellation and a rapid, 60-day removal, this bill severely limits the ability of the affected person to access legal defense or relief.
This mandatory, accelerated deportation process disproportionately impacts non-citizens who rely on public protest to advocate for change, particularly those in marginalized communities. The language of the bill is broad enough that being convicted of a relatively minor offense like “defacing” property could lead to the most severe immigration consequence possible. When the penalty for exercising a right—like free assembly and speech—is immediate removal, it creates a powerful “chilling effect.” People who are otherwise lawfully present in the U.S. will likely think twice, or ten times, before attending any demonstration that might involve civil disobedience, even if the cause is deeply important to them, simply because the risk of losing everything is too high.