This bill prohibits making changes to Medicare and Medicaid through the budget reconciliation process.
John "Jack" Reed
Senator
RI
This bill amends budget rules to explicitly prohibit making changes to Medicare and Medicaid through the budget reconciliation process. It updates existing law to ensure these major health programs are treated the same as other entitlement programs under special budget procedures. The goal is to safeguard Medicare and Medicaid from being altered using this fast-track legislative method.
This bill is all about procedural defense, specifically aimed at protecting Medicare and Medicaid from the budget axe. It’s a highly technical change to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, but the real-world impact is simple: it makes it much harder for Congress to use the fast-track budget reconciliation process to cut or change these critical health programs.
To understand this bill, you need a quick explainer on budget reconciliation. Normally, passing major legislation requires 60 votes in the Senate—a high bar. Reconciliation is a special procedure that allows certain budget-related bills to pass with a simple majority (51 votes). This speed and lower vote threshold make it tempting for lawmakers who want to make big, rapid changes to spending and taxes. However, existing rules already prevent this fast track from being used to touch Social Security's 'old-age' programs.
This new bill updates Section 310(g) of the Congressional Budget Act to explicitly put Medicare (Title XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX) under the same procedural protection. Essentially, Congress is declaring that if you want to overhaul or cut Medicare or Medicaid, you can’t sneak it through the 51-vote reconciliation loophole; you have to go through the full, regular legislative process that requires broader consensus.
Think of this as installing a heavy-duty security door on the two biggest healthcare programs in the country. For the millions of people who rely on Medicare for their retirement health coverage or Medicaid for essential care—from seniors in nursing homes to working families with children—this provides a massive layer of stability. If you’re a 40-year-old managing your parents’ healthcare or a small business owner whose employees rely on Medicaid, you want predictability. This bill delivers that by ensuring that any major changes to these programs require significant, bipartisan buy-in, rather than being subject to the political whims of a narrow majority.
It’s a procedural move, but it has tangible consequences: it stabilizes the financial foundation of these programs for beneficiaries. While this bill won't stop Congress from attempting to reform or cut these programs entirely, it forces them to slow down and use the standard legislative process, which tends to favor incremental changes over radical, rapid overhauls.