This bill amends drug price negotiation rules to exclude the time a drug was designated as an orphan drug from the negotiation clock.
John Barrasso
Senator
WY
The ORPHAN Cures Act modifies the Drug Price Negotiation Program by adjusting how the time a drug has been on the market is calculated for negotiation eligibility. Specifically, it excludes the period during which a drug was designated as treating a rare disease (an "orphan drug") from counting toward the negotiation clock. This ensures that drugs developed for rare conditions receive an extended period of market exclusivity before price negotiation can begin.
The Optimizing Research Progress Hope And New Cures Act—or the ORPHAN Cures Act for short—is making a targeted but significant change to the government’s drug price negotiation program. The core of the bill is simple: it adjusts the rules so that any time a drug spent treating a rare disease will not count toward the clock that determines when the government can negotiate its price. This effectively extends the period before price negotiation can begin for these specific drugs.
To understand this, you need to know how the current system works. When the government looks to negotiate the price of a drug, they wait a certain number of years after its initial approval. This bill, specifically Section 2, changes how that time is calculated for drugs that were once designated as “orphan drugs”—meaning they were developed to treat a rare disease or condition. For these drugs, the clock that counts down to price negotiation will essentially be paused for the duration the drug held that orphan status. The bill also clarifies the definition of a rare disease for this purpose, making sure the rules apply consistently across treatments for one or more rare conditions.
This is a classic policy trade-off. On one hand, this provision is designed to incentivize pharmaceutical companies to invest heavily in researching and developing treatments for rare diseases, which often have small patient populations and high development costs. By guaranteeing a longer period without government price negotiation, the bill offers drug makers extended market protection. This is a clear win for patients with rare conditions, as it could mean more treatments become available for them.
On the other hand, this means delayed cost savings for everyone else, especially taxpayers and those relying on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid. When a drug’s negotiation clock is paused, that drug can remain at its initial, often high, list price for a longer period. For example, if a drug was an orphan drug for five years before being approved for a wider, more common condition, those five years don’t count toward the negotiation timeline. This means patients and government payers will continue paying the higher, non-negotiated price for a potentially extended period, impacting overall healthcare budgets and consumer out-of-pocket costs.
Consider a scenario where a drug is initially approved to treat a rare form of cancer (earning it orphan status), but later gets approval to treat a more common condition, like a widespread autoimmune disorder. Under the existing rules, the negotiation clock would keep ticking. Under the ORPHAN Cures Act, that clock stops during the rare disease phase. This delay could mean millions in extra costs annually for government health programs, which ultimately translates to higher taxes or increased premiums down the line. While the intent is to spur innovation for small patient groups, the effect is a clear extension of market exclusivity for drug manufacturers, pushing back the date when consumers and payers might benefit from lower, negotiated prices.