This bill mandates that federal agencies submit comprehensive zero-based budgets every six years, including recommendations for reducing discretionary spending by at least 2 percent.
James Risch
Senator
ID
This bill mandates that federal agencies submit comprehensive zero-based budgets to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget every six years. Additionally, most agencies are required to identify specific programs for elimination to achieve a minimum 2 percent reduction in discretionary spending.
Imagine if every few years, instead of just asking for a small raise, you had to justify every single penny you spend to your boss—from your mortgage down to the streaming service you barely use. That is exactly what this bill proposes for the federal government. It mandates a "zero-based budget" process, requiring agencies to stop assuming their current funding is the baseline. Instead, they must re-evaluate their entire operation, rank their programs by importance, and consider entirely new ways to function. This isn't a one-time audit; it’s a total fiscal reset that hits every agency on a six-year cycle.
Under Section 1, agency managers can no longer just copy and paste last year’s numbers. They are required to examine their core objectives and costs from scratch. For a regular person, this could mean more efficient government services if agencies find better ways to operate. For example, a small business owner waiting on a permit might see a streamlined process if an agency realizes their current paperwork trail is a relic of the 90s. However, the bill also requires agencies to look at "alternative ways" to run activities, which could lead to significant shifts in how programs—like job training or food safety inspections—are delivered to the public.
Here is where the rubber meets the road: most agencies aren't just being asked to reorganize; they’re being told to trim the fat. The bill requires agencies to recommend specific program cuts that would reduce discretionary spending by at least 2% compared to the previous year. If you rely on a specific federal grant for your community center or a niche research program, those are the types of items that might end up on the recommended cut list. It forces agencies to pick favorites, ranking their work by "importance," which could leave smaller but vital programs vulnerable to the scale.
Not everyone is invited to this belt-tightening party. The bill specifically exempts the Department of Defense and the National Nuclear Security Administration from having to recommend that 2% spending cut. While they still have to do the zero-based budgeting, they don't face the same pressure to suggest where to slash their budgets. For the agencies that are included, the administrative burden will be massive. We’re talking about a six-year planning window (the upcoming year plus four more) that requires intense data collection. For the average citizen, the risk is that your local federal office might get bogged down in bureaucratic accounting rather than actually providing the services your taxes pay for.